Effects of School Shootings

School shootings has only recently become a national concern. Just in the past few years’ school shootings have become almost “”normal”” and many people will agree with that statement. There are people who believe that those who commit the school shootings are actually victims themselves, and have been bullied. Others believe there is no correlation between the students who do the school shootings because they believe they grew up in a supportive family, with no significant family issues. Within this paper you’ll read about possible causes for the school shootings, such as, violent video games, bullying, the media, etc.

you will also read about how gender has been completely avoided when it comes to the issue of the school shootings.

The concern over shootings in schools has prompted intense national dialogue, in recent years, over World Health Organization or what’s answerable. One needn’t look laborious to seek out any variety of “”experts”” World Health Organization are willing to weigh in on the difficulty. Nonetheless despite the legion of political and scientific commentaries on the school shootings, these voices have all singularly and stunningly lost the purpose. In America violence is glorified, there are more violent games to purchase than there are say sport games. Kids are playing shooting games younger and younger and think it’s cool or fun to have someone bleed out to death. There have been many debates and still are debates about if the media is to blame for this gun violence, the media shows too much violence and kids are easily influenced by what they watch. “”Barry Krisberg, president of the National Council on Crime and Delinquency, argues that both the media and guns are at fault. He says, “”The violence in the media and the easy availability of guns are what is driving the slaughter of innocents”” (Lacayo, 1998, p. 39). Or perhaps, if we are to believe National Rifle Association (NRA) president Charlton Heston, the problem is not that there are too many guns but that there are not enough guns”” (Kimmel, Mahler, 2003).

A few have proposed mental variables, which include records of early life abuse, absent fathers, dominant moms, violence in youth, volatile family surroundings, or the moms’ worry of their kids, as viable reasons. Although those causes are all theoretically feasible, e, it appears that none of them hold up. Almost all the shooters came from intact and relatively strong households, with no records of abuse. If they had mental problems in any respect, they would have been exceptionally minor, and the boys flew below the radar of any school official or member of the family who might have noticed something critically wrong. That being said, there are things that happen under the radar all of the time, and not all abuse is noticeable. Emotional abuse is a lot harder to catch, than physical and sometimes it’s easy to pass as “”mentally stable””. What doesn’t get looked at enough is the content of the shootings; the main focus is on who the perpetrators are. For example they focus on how the media influences violence, drugs, and alcohol behavior, they don’t focus on the local school cultures or on gender as a risk factor. The studies that have been conducted don’t focus on gender, they just mention how there’s gang violence, violence in schools, teen violence, etc.

They pay little or no interest to the apparent fact that all of the school shootings were done by boys-masculinity is the single greatest danger component in school violence. A few came from intact families, others from single-parent houses; a few boys had acted violently inside the past, others have been quiet and unsuspecting; and a few boys also expressed rage at their dad and mom (killed their mother and father the same morning), while others appeared happy and healthy in their households. Yet, if the killers in the schools in Littleton, Pearl, Paducah, Springfield, and Jonesboro had all been girls, gender might absolutely be the only cause and the mainstream media would know it. But, the analytic blindness of those studies runs deeper than gender. What can be identified is two exceptional waves of school violence since 1980. Within the first, from 1982 to 1991, most people of all of the school shootings had been nonrandom (i.e., the victims have been particularly centered by way of the perpetrators). Most had been in urban, internal-city schools and the students were mostly of color. Certainly all concerned handguns, all have been sparked by means of disputes over girlfriends or paraphernalia, and all had been devoted via boys. These instances have not entirely disappeared, but they’ve declined dramatically. Seeing that 1992, handiest 1 of the random college shootings took place in inner-metropolis schools (it was done by a Black scholar), while the last 22 had been committed by way of White students in suburban schools. However, all over again, all shootings have been done via boys.

The shooters have come to be White and suburban middle-class boys, most people has shifted the blame far from organization tendencies to character mental troubles, assuming that the boys were deviants who broke a ways from an otherwise genteel suburban way of life-that their aberrant behavior turned into explainable by using some psychopathological component. Even though it isn’t any doubt that the boys who did these horrible acts did have essential intellectual problems, this kind of framing masks the sizeable function that race and class, similarly to gender, play a major role in the violence. If all the school shooters were unprivileged African American boys in the schools, it’s not likely at all that their acts could have been seen as deviant or pathological. As a substitute, discussions could have centered on the effects of the way of life of poverty for violence among inner-town kids. Most students, who are White or non-White, male or female aren’t dangerous or violent. School shootings aren’t normal and schools are still seen as a safe place.

There is a great deal at stake for boys and, as a result, they have interaction in a variety of evasive strategies to ensure that no person receives the wrong idea about them (and their manhood). These come from the reputedly comic (despite the fact that telling), including these younger boys occupying 3 movie seats with the aid of putting their coats at the seat between them, to the simply tragic, which include engaging in homophobic violence, bullying, menacing other boys, masochistic or sadistic games and rituals, immoderate chance taking (inebriated or aggressive using), or even sexual predation and attack. Heterosexuals, who are targeted by means of their peers for steady harassment, bullying, and gay baiting feel the effect of homophobia, no longer felt by gay and lesbian students. However, in many cases, gay baiting is “”misdirected”” at heterosexual adolescents who can be incredibly gender nonconforming. This fact is absolutely evidenced in many of the bills we’ve collected of the shootings. Boys have a tendency to keep their emotions inside and when they do show emotion it’s inflicting pain on others through physical violence. If someone in the boys’ group gets called a “”homo”” for instance, they have to show their dominance to everyone in the group by beating the person up, to show they are a true “”man””.

Social scientists at the moment are carrying out research of those events with a purpose to determine their trends and styles. Studies suggest that the school shooting incidents take place at the beginning of the school day, the lunch period, or at the end of the school day. Usually, a threat via a note or other action indicating risk for violence came about prior to the event. Shooters have been also expressed some form of suicidal conduct before the event have been bullied by their friends or students in general (Siegel, Welsh, 2015). Bullying in schools has raised a problem of deep concern throughout the United States. This interest is due, in huge part, to reviews indicating the affiliation among school bullying and school shootings. It is essential to be conscious that school bullying almost commonly takes place in groups, it’s not very common that just one person is doing the bullying. With students taking over one or multiple roles at some stage in time and situations: bully, intention, bully assistant, bully reinforcer, intention defender, and outsider/bystander.

Young people are much more likely to die by means of firearm murder or suicide in states where the gun possession is more customary. In addition, family gun ownership has been proven to noticeably improve the threat for murder in the domestic, and homicide charges overall. Research analyses have also shown that the greater access people have to firearms, the lower levels of interpersonal trust, and the higher the amount of murder. A strong association has additionally been located among standard state suicide rates and firearm ownership charges. Use of mental health care has also been considered as a factor in at least some types of situations. For example, it has been shown that the more people who have access to health care via the state of federal aid for mental health have been linked to the reduced state suicide rates. When people don’t have the proper access to the mental health care they need, they go untreated and that’s why it’s been associated with the increase of suicide rates. Not having access to the appropriate mental health for those who need it, is a factor as to why there has been an increase in suicide rates.

Study analysis on school violence has addressed several areas, especially the extent of school violence, victimization at school, anxiety about crime at school, and security procedures to address physical violence at school. These efforts often provide conflicting results that might provide limited guidance for administrators to offer learning environments that are safe. Between the efforts, which may have recently been taken by schools to address, violence are boosting security and surveillance techniques; they are changing the climate of the school, counseling, and curricular or instructional programs.

Did you like this example?

430

23