Legal Drinking Age Reform

Unarguably, the improvement in people's living standards owes much to scientific breakthroughs, technical advances, and social developments. Among these societal progressions, maintaining the legal drinking age at 21 has been an effective policy, especially in the context of supporting young people's health and safety. However, the debate surrounding whether this age limit has positive or negative impacts continues to evoke strong opinions. In my view, lowering the drinking age would lead to detrimental consequences, such as impaired brain development, increased car accidents, and greater alcohol access for high school students.

These concerns will be explored in detail below.

Brain Development

The adolescent brain is in a critical stage of development, and alcohol consumption can interfere with this process. Laurence Steinberg, a professor of psychology at Temple University, emphasizes that "alcohol is especially damaging to the adolescent brain, leading to later abuse and addiction" (“Lower the Drinking Age to 19”). Early exposure to alcohol poses severe mental health risks, a topic that remains contentious in today's society. Numerous medical studies have illustrated the adverse effects of underage drinking. For instance, regular alcohol consumption can hinder the development of the brain's frontal lobes, which are essential for emotional regulation, planning, and organization (“Should the Drinking Age be Lowered from 21 to a Younger Age?”).

Young individuals who consume alcohol before reaching the age of 21 may experience decreased decision-making abilities, reduced public responsibility, and increased tendencies toward violence or even suicide. The teenage years are a period of crucial brain development, which should not be disrupted. At 21, individuals are expected to focus on education, career, and social responsibilities, all of which require unimpaired cognitive functioning. Sequeira noted, "Teens often start drinking due to curiosity and experimentation. The younger they start, the more likely they are to continue to drink and to drink larger amounts" (“Binge Drinking”). This evidence highlights that alcohol has a more significant impact on adolescents than adults, potentially leading to lasting consequences.

Traffic Accidents and Safety

Preserving the drinking age at 21 contributes to a reduction in traffic accidents and youth fatalities. Lowering the drinking age could increase young people's involvement in alcohol-related incidents. According to Tara Watson in "Lowering the Drinking Age has Serious Consequences," a lower drinking age correlates with more traffic fatalities, unplanned pregnancies, and crime. Teenagers often lack the life experience and maturity needed to navigate complex situations responsibly, particularly in public spaces.

If the legal drinking age were reduced to 18, the likelihood of car accidents involving young drivers would increase significantly. Since the establishment of the drinking age at 21 in 1975, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration reported a 13% decrease in car accidents involving drivers aged 18-20 (SFGate). When police respond to car accidents linked to "drink and drive" or "text and drive," the blame often falls on the "drink and drive" scenario. Such incidents can lead to criminal records that may negatively impact young people's futures.

Access to Alcohol

A lowered drinking age would exacerbate the "trickle-down" effect, granting high school and even middle school students greater access to alcohol. The article "Minimum Age Limits Worldwide" notes that individuals who can legally purchase alcohol often buy it for their younger peers. Although drinking alcohol at 21 may not be problematic, purchasing it for underage individuals presents significant issues. If the drinking age were lowered to 18, access to alcohol would extend to younger adolescents, such as those aged 15-17 or even younger.

This scenario would create more problems than it solves, harming older teens and younger adolescents who lack the maturity to handle unpredictable situations. Consequently, alcoholism and its associated mental health issues could become more prevalent among young people.

Counterarguments

Some argue that 18-year-olds, who can vote, marry, and serve in the military, should be allowed to purchase alcohol. In "Return the Drinking Age to 18, and Enforce It," Gabrielle Glaser suggests that, just as teenagers are taught to drive before receiving car keys, they should learn about alcohol's risks and harms early on. While 18 is considered the age of adulthood, many young people still rely on economic support and lack the emotional maturity to consume alcohol responsibly. If intoxicated, the rights to vote, marry, and serve in the military become irrelevant.

Conclusion

In conclusion, maintaining the drinking age at 21 is crucial in today's society. Young people already face numerous opportunities to access alcohol, leading to negative effects such as impaired brain development, increased car accidents, and greater access to alcohol for high school students. We can prevent early drinking by discussing the risks, harms, and disapproval of alcohol through education in classrooms, public housing, and family discussions. By focusing on these preventive measures, we can better support the well-being and development of young individuals.

Did you like this example?

1015

53