Debunking Myths: the Truth Behind Flight 93’s Tragic End

writer-avatar
Exclusively available on PapersOwl
Updated: May 12, 2024
Listen
Read Summary
Download
Cite this
Debunking Myths: the Truth Behind Flight 93’s Tragic End
Summary

This essay about the fate of United Airlines Flight 93 contests the conspiracy theory that it was shot down by the U.S. military on September 11, 2001. It examines key points such as the widespread debris from the crash, the military’s orders on that day, and eyewitness accounts, concluding that the evidence supports the official narrative. The flight crashed due to the heroic efforts of passengers attempting to reclaim the aircraft from hijackers, not because of a military intervention. The essay emphasizes that conspiracy theories distract from the bravery of these individuals and the factual, investigated events of that tragic day, underscoring the importance of honoring their memory with the truth.

Category:History
Date added
2024/05/12
Order Original Essay

How it works

Within the heartbreaking mosaic of events that transpired on September 11, 2001, United Airlines Flight 93's narrative occupies a singular position in American memory. Unlike the other flights that were taken over that day, this one was not able to reach its anticipated destination of Washington, D.C. Rather, it went down in a Pennsylvanian field near Shanksville. The bravery of the passengers who tried to take back control of the plane from the hijackers is widely known and appreciated. However, surrounding this act of bravery are persistent rumors and conspiracy theories suggesting that Flight 93 was actually shot down by the U.

Need a custom essay on the same topic?
Give us your paper requirements, choose a writer and we’ll deliver the highest-quality essay!
Order now

S. military in a desperate bid to prevent another targeted attack.

This theory hinges on a few key points of contention. Proponents argue that debris scattered over several miles indicates the plane was shot down, as such a spread would be inconsistent with a crash following an onboard struggle. Additionally, they point to the rapid response of the military that day and the existence of a shoot-down authorization given by then-Vice President Dick Cheney, which, they claim, suggests a military intervention took place.

First and foremost, it is crucial to understand the context of that fateful morning. The chaos and unprecedented nature of the attacks led to a fog of war scenario where communication and immediate facts were muddled. The order authorized by Cheney indeed allowed for a shoot-down if necessary, but this was a measure of last resort, and there is no evidence that it was executed on Flight 93.

The debris field spread, often cited as evidence of a shootdown, can actually be explained by the high-speed impact with which Flight 93 hit the ground. Experts and official reports confirm that the plane was traveling at about 580 miles per hour when it crashed. At such a high speed, the impact force would naturally scatter debris across a wide area, a fact consistent with other high-speed crashes. Moreover, the FBI's extensive investigation found no evidence of an external explosion that would indicate a missile strike or a shootdown.

Eyewitness accounts from that day also support the conclusion that the passengers were fighting to regain control of the aircraft. Phone calls made from the plane provided real-time details of their brave attempt. The sudden changes in the flight path and the erratic maneuvers of the aircraft in its final moments are consistent with a struggle in the cockpit rather than an external military action.

Further dispelling the shootdown theory is the lack of physical evidence for such an event. Missile strikes leave distinct signatures on wreckage, none of which were found on the debris recovered from Flight 93. The National Transportation Safety Board's (NTSB) report outlines the aircraft's destruction as consistent with a ground impact from a high-speed dive, which was corroborated by the cockpit voice recorder data.

The persistence of the shootdown theory can likely be attributed to the deep-seated need for answers and the complexity of accepting the random, chaotic elements of such a catastrophic day. Conspiracy theories provide a sense of control or alternative explanation that some find comforting in the face of such senseless tragedy. However, they also undermine the heroism of the passengers whose actions likely prevented further loss of life by ensuring that Flight 93 did not reach its intended target.

In conclusion, the evidence overwhelmingly supports the fact that Flight 93 was not shot down, but rather crashed as a result of the passengers' courageous efforts to stop the hijackers. This act of heroism should be remembered and respected as a poignant reminder of the resilience and bravery that individuals can muster in the face of dire threats. While the allure of conspiracy theories might offer an alternative narrative, they distract from the factual events verified by extensive investigation and disrespect the memory of those who fought valiantly that day. It's our responsibility to uphold the truth and honor their sacrifice.

The deadline is too short to read someone else's essay
Hire a verified expert to write you a 100% Plagiarism-Free paper
WRITE MY ESSAY
Papersowl
4.7/5
Sitejabber
4.7/5
Reviews.io
4.9/5

Cite this page

Debunking Myths: The Truth Behind Flight 93's Tragic End. (2024, May 12). Retrieved from https://papersowl.com/examples/debunking-myths-the-truth-behind-flight-93s-tragic-end/