Caravaggio’s Religious Artistry

Caravaggio, a master of Baroque art, is renowned for his dramatic use of chiaroscuro and his unflinching portrayal of the human condition. Despite his artistic genius, he was not without controversy, as evidenced by the rejection of his painting "Death of the Virgin." This essay will explore the reasons behind the rejection of this significant work, delving into Caravaggio's personal circumstances, the religious dogmas of the time, and the societal perceptions of his subject matter. By examining these elements, we can gain a deeper understanding of how Caravaggio's approach clashed with the expectations and beliefs of his contemporaries.

Caravaggio's Circumstances and Patronage

At the time of the commission for "Death of the Virgin," Caravaggio was residing in Palazzo Mattei, under the protection of Cardinal Girolamo Mattei. Although no longer living with Cardinal del Monte, whose patronage had been instrumental in his early career, Caravaggio still relied heavily on this cardinal's political influence. This was crucial, especially when Caravaggio faced legal troubles, such as being arrested for carrying arms without a license. Andrew Graham-Dixon notes that Caravaggio claimed to be on Cardinal del Monte's household roll, likely leading to his release from prison with the cardinal's intervention. This incident highlights the precarious nature of Caravaggio's position in Roman society, where his volatile personality often put him at odds with authority, necessitating powerful allies.

The Commission and Its Rejection

In 1601, Caravaggio received a commission from Laerzio Cherubini, a distinguished jurist for the Vatican, to create an altarpiece for the Cherubini family chapel in the Church of Santa Maria della Scala in Rome. Although the commission was granted in 1601, Caravaggio did not complete the painting until 1604-06. Upon completion, the work was rejected by the Carmelites overseeing the church, who opted for a replacement by Carlo Saraceni. The reasons for this rejection are multifaceted but can be traced back to the painting's perceived incongruity with Catholic dogma and societal norms.

Marian Dogmas and Artistic Interpretation

To comprehend the controversy surrounding "Death of the Virgin," it is essential to examine the four Marian dogmas central to Roman Catholic belief. These doctrines underscore the Virgin Mary's paramount significance in Catholic theology. The Immaculate Conception, proclaimed by Pope Pius IX in 1854, asserts that Mary was conceived without original sin. The belief in Mary as the Mother of God emphasizes her role in Jesus Christ's birth through the Holy Spirit. Furthermore, the perpetual virginity of Mary, affirmed by Church Fathers such as Saint Ambrose and Saint Augustine, maintains that Mary remained a virgin throughout her life. Lastly, the Assumption, declared by Pope Pius XII in 1950, holds that Mary was taken into heaven without experiencing death, merely falling asleep before her assumption.

Caravaggio's depiction of Mary in "Death of the Virgin" clashed with these dogmas. By portraying Mary in a lifeless state, the painting directly contradicts the belief in her Assumption. This was a significant factor in the painting's rejection, as it was seen as a theological misstep that failed to honor the sanctity and unique status of the Virgin Mary within Catholic doctrine.

Societal Perceptions and Controversy

Further compounding the controversy was Caravaggio's choice of model for the Virgin Mary. Giulio Mancini, a contemporary art collector and physician, claimed that Caravaggio used a prostitute from Ortaccio as his model. Mancini's medical background and his attempt to purchase the painting suggest that Caravaggio may have even used a deceased prostitute as a model, a notion supported by the realistic, almost unidealized portrayal of Mary. This choice was scandalous, as it associated the Virgin Mary with a class of women linked to moral and social disorder in early modern Italian culture. Prostitution was not only about sexual transactions but was also associated with vices like drinking, cursing, and blasphemy. Such associations further fueled the rejection of the painting, as it seemed to undermine the Virgin's purity and holiness.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the rejection of Caravaggio's "Death of the Virgin" was rooted in a complex interplay of religious dogma, societal norms, and the artist's provocative choices. Caravaggio's portrayal challenged deeply held beliefs about the Virgin Mary's sanctity, while his choice of model introduced a layer of social controversy that was unacceptable to the religious authorities of the time. This episode in Caravaggio's career underscores the tension between artistic innovation and adherence to religious and cultural expectations. By examining these dynamics, we gain insight into the challenges faced by artists who push boundaries and the enduring impact of societal and religious norms on artistic expression.

Did you like this example?

779

32