Religious Faith in Early American Poetry

Introduction

Anne Bradstreet, a pioneering female poet in 17th-century America, is often celebrated for her subtle yet powerful challenges to the patriarchal norms of her Puritan society. Despite her feminist leanings, Bradstreet's work reflects a deep entanglement with the religious doctrines that governed her life. Her poetry, often infused with personal reflections, reveals a complex interplay between her devotion to her husband and her faith in God, raising intriguing questions about her feminist identity and religious ethics. The Puritan faith she adhered to was inherently male-dominated, perhaps explaining her subdued expression of feminist ideas.

Had she been more vocal, she might have faced severe repercussions, making her both a product and a quiet critic of her time.

Feminism Within Constraints

Anne Bradstreet's life was marked by the belief that every event, including her frequent illnesses and the burning of her home, was divinely ordained. In her poem "Upon the Burning of Our House," she writes, “And to my God my heart did cry / To strengthen me in my distress /…Yea, so it was, and so ‘twas just. / It was His own, it was not mine” (269-270). This acceptance of divine will reflects the internalization of Puritanical teachings, which often left women resigned to their fates. Bradstreet's environment was daunting; to assert her opinions openly would risk her safety and social standing. Yet, her writings subtly challenge societal norms, weaving early feminist thought into her poetry without overtly defying the patriarchal order. She cleverly uses her work to express dissatisfaction with the societal constraints placed on women, often employing sarcasm and irony to highlight her point. In her poem "The Prologue," Bradstreet navigates the societal expectation of women with a tone of self-deprecation that borders on satire. She praises the 'Great Bartas,' acknowledging his superior talent while simultaneously critiquing the limitations imposed on her as a female writer. In stanza 3, she writes, “And this to mend, alas, no art is able, ‘Cause nature made it so irreparable” (208). This line reflects a societal view that women, by nature, could not achieve the same intellectual heights as men. Bradstreet's acknowledgment of her perceived inferiority critiques the societal norms that dismiss women's potential. Her writing, though self-deprecating on the surface, is a subtle protest against the limited roles available to women, suggesting that their contributions should not be confined to the domestic sphere.

Religious Beliefs and Feminist Expression

Bradstreet's use of reverse psychology highlights the unequal treatment of women in her community. Women who dared to write risked stepping outside their prescribed roles, facing social censure as a result. Many women were denied education, contributing to a sense of intellectual inferiority. However, Bradstreet, born into a supportive family, had access to education and the Earl of Lincoln’s extensive library, which nurtured her literary talents. This privileged background allowed her to express her views more freely than many of her contemporaries, albeit within the confines of her society's expectations.

In "The Prologue," Bradstreet boldly addresses the gender biases of her time. She writes, “I am obnoxious to each carping tongue / Who says my hand a needle better fits, / A poet’s pen all scorn I should thus wrong, / For such despite they cast of female wits: / If what I do prove well, it won’t advance, / They’ll say it’s stolen, or else it was by chance” (239). Here, Bradstreet articulates the skepticism she faced as a woman writer, acknowledging that her achievements would likely be dismissed as mere chance or plagiarism. Yet, she calls for a "small acknowledgment" of women's contributions, subtly challenging the societal norms that relegated women to the background. Her plea for recognition, although modest, undermines the assumption that men are inherently superior in all domains.

Conclusion

Anne Bradstreet's writings reflect the tension between her feminist inclinations and her Puritan faith. Her work navigates the restrictive norms of her patriarchal society, subtly advocating for women's recognition and challenging the status quo. Although her feminist expressions were constrained by her religious beliefs, they remain significant for their nuanced critique of gender roles. Bradstreet's education and literary talent allowed her to craft a body of work that, while aligning with Puritan values, quietly subverted them. Her poetry underscores the ongoing struggle for gender equality, a battle that persists today. Despite the limitations of her time, Bradstreet's legacy as a feminist voice endures, reminding us of the power of subtle resistance in the face of overwhelming societal constraints.

Did you like this example?

246

10