Aristotle’s Philosophy on Perfect Happiness

Aristotle's philosophical exploration of happiness, particularly the notion of perfect happiness, remains a cornerstone in the study of ethics and the human condition. His assertion that true happiness is achieved through contemplative activity offers a profound insight into the human pursuit of fulfillment. This essay delves into Aristotle's reasoning behind this assertion, examining the prioritization of rational thought as the pathway to happiness. Furthermore, it addresses the implications of this philosophy for individuals with mental disabilities, highlighting potential limitations and ethical considerations.

By analyzing these elements, the essay aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of Aristotle's view of happiness and its relevance in contemporary discussions on human well-being.

Aristotle's Theory of Happiness

According to Aristotle, perfect happiness, or eudaimonia, is attainable through the activity of contemplation. He identifies two primary reasons for this belief. Firstly, he argues that contemplative activity is the highest form of activity because it engages the best part of the human soul: reason. Reason is considered divine, and engaging with the highest and most knowable objects through reason elevates this activity above others. Secondly, contemplative activity is deemed the most continuous, as individuals can engage with truth and knowledge more consistently than with any other activity. This prioritization of rationality underscores Aristotle's belief that living a life guided by reason is superior and, consequently, the most fulfilling and pleasant. He famously claims, "If reason is divine, then, in comparison with man, the life according to it is divine in comparison with human life." Thus, he concludes, "The life according to reason is best and pleasantest since reason more than anything else is the man. This life, therefore, is also the happiest."

Limitations and Ethical Considerations

While Aristotle's arguments present a cogent case for the supremacy of rational contemplation in achieving happiness, they also raise critical ethical questions. One significant issue is the apparent exclusion of individuals with mental disabilities from the possibility of attaining perfect happiness. Aristotle's philosophy, which heavily emphasizes rational capacities, seems to overlook the diverse range of cognitive abilities that exist within humanity. For individuals with cognitive impairments, such as those with developmental disabilities, the potential to engage in contemplative activities is inherently limited. This raises ethical concerns about the inclusivity of Aristotle’s definition of happiness. If happiness is contingent upon rational contemplation, does this mean that those with diminished reasoning capabilities are barred from achieving the highest form of happiness? Furthermore, can any form of happiness be accessible to individuals with severe cognitive impairments? These questions suggest a need for a more inclusive understanding of happiness that accounts for varying cognitive abilities and recognizes the value of different forms of fulfillment and well-being.

Conclusion

In conclusion, Aristotle's philosophy of happiness through contemplative activity offers a valuable framework for understanding the pursuit of fulfillment. His emphasis on reason as the highest form of activity underscores the significance of intellectual engagement in achieving true happiness. However, this perspective also necessitates a critical examination of its implications for individuals with mental disabilities. As society continues to evolve, there is a growing recognition of the need to adopt more inclusive definitions of happiness that consider diverse cognitive abilities and experiences. By doing so, we can ensure that the pursuit of happiness is accessible to all individuals, regardless of their cognitive capacities. Ultimately, Aristotle's philosophy serves as a foundation for further discussion and exploration of what it means to live a fulfilling and meaningful life.

Did you like this example?

553

29