Origins of American Imperialism

In the history of American foreign policy, race has been a pivotal factor influencing decisions and actions on the global stage. The entanglement of racism with diplomacy has often justified brutal expansions and imperialistic ventures of the United States. A close examination of historical events, such as the American involvement in the Philippines, reveals the intertwined nature of race and imperialism. Historians like Paul A. Kramer, Neil Irvin Painter, and Walter L. Williams have scrutinized these connections, offering insights into how racial ideologies fueled American expansionism.

This essay argues that race was a fundamental building block of American imperialism, particularly in the context of the Philippines and the Spanish-American War. It explores how the concept of Social Darwinism was employed to rationalize imperialistic endeavors, supported the supposed need to "civilize" indigenous populations, and reflected broader racial attitudes prevalent in American society at the time.

Race and Imperialism

The notion of imperialism in the United States has often been justified through racial ideologies, as historians have demonstrated. Paul A. Kramer, a notable historian from Vanderbilt University, offers a compelling analysis in his article “Race-Making and Colonial Violence in the U.S. Empire: The Philippine-American War as Race War.” Kramer delves into the effects of assimilation policies in the Philippines, highlighting how racial perceptions influenced these efforts. He argues that the American government's methods of assimilation, particularly through the actions of U.S. soldiers, were deeply rooted in racial ideologies. This assimilation made imperialism more palatable by framing it as a benevolent endeavor to uplift supposedly "uncivilized" peoples.

Furthermore, Neil Irvin Painter, a historian with a critical stance on imperialism, critiques the concept of American Exceptionalism in her book, “Standing At Armageddon.” Painter points out that the Western world, including the United States, held the belief that white nations were inherently more civilized than others. This belief justified American expansionism under the guise of a moral obligation to guide and civilize the Philippines. Her analysis underscores that the superiority complex embedded in American Exceptionalism was a key driver of imperialistic pursuits.

Walter L. Williams, a former history professor at the University of California, further illuminates this connection by examining Social Darwinism and American Exceptionalism in his work “The Journal of American History.” Williams argues that the ideology of being a superior race propelled the imperialistic ambitions of the United States, particularly towards Hispanic countries. His analysis of the economic development disparities during the 19th century reinforces the idea that imperialism was seen as a necessary strategy for survival in a competitive global landscape. Social Darwinism, which emphasized the survival of the fittest, became a justification for expansion, as nations believed they needed to conquer others to ensure their own prosperity.

Cultural Reflections

The cultural reflections of this racialized imperialism are evident in popular American culture of the time. Bonnie M. Miller, in her book “From Liberation to Conquest,” explores the role of American cartoons in shaping public perceptions of overseas conflicts. These cartoons often depicted Hispanic colonies through a racial lens, classifying people based on physical features and perpetuating stereotypes. Miller's analysis reveals how racism was embedded in American culture, setting the stage for imperialistic ventures by reinforcing the notion of racial hierarchies.

The racial dynamics within the United States also played a significant role in shaping imperialistic attitudes. The views held towards African Americans and Native Americans were projected onto the Filipinos, justifying imperialism as a civilizing mission. The American government, influenced by Social Darwinism, believed it had a self-proclaimed right to expand its territory due to its perceived superiority in the social hierarchy. This belief was not merely a political stance but was deeply ingrained in the cultural and social fabric of the nation.

Conclusion

In conclusion, race was undeniably a cornerstone of American imperialism, particularly during the Philippine-American War and the Spanish-American War. The ideology of Social Darwinism provided a convenient rationale for expansion, framing it as a natural and necessary process for the survival and success of the United States. The racial ideologies that permeated American society were instrumental in justifying the subjugation and assimilation of other peoples. Historians like Paul A. Kramer, Neil Irvin Painter, and Walter L. Williams have highlighted these connections, offering a nuanced understanding of how race and imperialism were intertwined in American foreign policy. By examining these historical perspectives, we can better understand the complex interplay of race, imperialism, and cultural perceptions that shaped American actions on the global stage.

Did you like this example?

378

16