Victor Frankenstein Film Analysis

The 2015 movie “Frankenstein,” directed by Bernard Rose, offers a modern adaptation of Mary Shelley’s classic novel. Unlike many of its predecessors, this version takes a unique approach by presenting the story from the perspective of the creature, renamed Adam, and setting it in present-day Los Angeles. This reimagining of Shelley’s narrative probes into themes of humanity, creation, and alienation, reflecting on the existential struggles that resonate even in modern times.

The film stars Xavier Samuel as Adam, who is created by a husband and wife team of scientists aiming to use technology to overcome human mortality.

Unlike the original character who is pieced together from corpses, Adam in the 2015 adaptation is grown from synthetic DNA, bringing a contemporary twist to the idea of artificial life. The portrayal of his creation touches on modern scientific debates surrounding biotechnology and genetic engineering, grounding the story’s fantastical elements in current real-world scientific advancements.

Adam’s journey is fraught with horror and violence, much like the creature in Shelley’s original work. As he navigates through the urban wilderness of Los Angeles, Adam encounters not only physical brutality but also the profound loneliness of being the only one of his kind. His experiences with humans are mostly hostile, showcasing society’s fear and rejection of the “other,” a theme that echoes throughout Shelley’s text. This external conflict is mirrored by Adam’s inner turmoil as he grapples with his identity and purpose. The film delves into these existential themes, questioning what it means to be human and the ethical ramifications of creating life.

The visual style of the film enhances these themes through stark contrasts of light and shadow, creating a Gothic atmosphere that harkens back to the novel’s origins while also feeling distinctly modern. The grim settings of downtown Los Angeles provide a backdrop that highlights the stark isolation Adam feels in a world full of life but devoid of understanding and compassion for him.

Moreover, “Frankenstein” 2015 shifts focus from the creator’s perspective to that of the creature, offering a narrative centered on Adam’s experiences rather than those of his creators. This shift allows the audience to empathize with Adam, challenging viewers to confront their perceptions of monstrosity and morality. The creators, played by Carrie-Anne Moss and Danny Huston, are portrayed not as malevolent figures but as flawed humans who cannot control the consequences of their creation, adding layers to the discussion of ethical science and parental responsibility.

In conclusion, the 2015 adaptation of “Frankenstein” provides a fresh perspective on Shelley’s age-old story by infusing contemporary issues such as genetic engineering and societal alienation. By focusing on the creature’s journey and portraying him as a sympathetic character, the film invites viewers to reflect on the implications of scientific progress and the timeless question of what it truly means to be human. Bernard Rose’s “Frankenstein” stands out as a thoughtful and provocative reinterpretation of a literary classic, demonstrating that the story’s themes are just as relevant today as they were in the 19th century.

Did you like this example?

243

13