The Undercurrents of the Armenian Genocide: a Complex Web of Causes

History is littered with events that challenge our understanding of humanity, urging us to confront the depths to which human behavior can plunge. One such event, the Armenian Genocide, unfolded in the early 20th century, casting a long shadow over subsequent generations. Though a century has passed since its occurrence, understanding its causes remains vital, not only for historical accuracy but to ensure that such tragedies are never repeated.

At the heart of the Armenian Genocide were the orchestrated deportations and mass killings of 1.

5 million ethnic Armenians by the Ottoman government between 1915 and 1923. But what propelled such a horrifying act? The causes, like many events of this scale, are multifaceted and intertwined, requiring a layered examination.

To begin, we must acknowledge the declining state of the Ottoman Empire, often referred to as the “sick man of Europe.” By the dawn of the 20th century, the empire was crumbling, having lost significant territories in Europe and facing internal strife. Nationalistic fervor began to rise, with the ruling party, the Committee of Union and Progress (CUP), championing a vision of a homogenous state defined by Turkish identity and Sunni Islam. Within this context, the Christian Armenian minority, who had lived in the region for millennia, became increasingly marginalized.

Economic factors also played a role. The Armenians, traditionally more urban and involved in trade and commerce, were often perceived as more prosperous than their Turkish counterparts. Envy and resentment simmered, especially against the backdrop of an empire in decline. The Armenian success was sometimes viewed as coming at the expense of Turkish prosperity, further deepening the rift.

Moreover, as World War I began, the Ottoman Empire aligned itself with the Central Powers. The geopolitical tensions intensified existing animosities. When some Armenians sided with Russia – the Ottoman’s adversary in the war – it gave the Ottoman leadership an excuse to label the entire Armenian population as a potential threat. This perceived treachery, whether real or exaggerated, provided a pretext for the subsequent actions against the Armenians.

Religious differences further exacerbated divisions. While the majority of the Ottoman population was Muslim, the Armenians were Christian. In an environment rife with nationalism and a desire for homogeneity, these differences were not just religious but were perceived as challenges to the very fabric of the envisioned Turkish nation-state.

Lastly, ineffective international oversight allowed for the escalation of hostilities against the Armenians. While reports of the atrocities reached global audiences, the lack of a coordinated international response enabled the continuation of the genocide.

In piecing together the tragedy of the Armenian Genocide, one confronts a mosaic of causes: a decaying empire’s desperation to regain its lost glory, economic resentment, war, religious differences, and the absence of global intervention. However, while understanding these causes is essential, it’s equally crucial to remember the individual lives lost and affected. Behind the numbers and geopolitical explanations are stories of families torn apart, cultures disrupted, and an entire community forever scarred by the horrors they endured.

As we reflect on the Armenian Genocide, it serves as a potent reminder of the dangers of unchecked nationalism, prejudice, and international apathy. Recognizing and understanding the causes of such events is the first step in ensuring that history does not repeat itself. The Armenian Genocide, with its profound human cost, stands as a testament to the imperative of global vigilance, empathy, and the continuous pursuit of justice.

Did you like this example?

278

12