the Legal Drinking Age: Benefits of Raising it to 25

The debate surrounding the legal drinking age is a persistent one, with proponents arguing for a variety of age limits based on different social, economic, and health-related grounds. The current legal drinking age in many countries, including the United States, is 21. However, there is a growing discourse advocating for raising the drinking age to 25. The proponents of this change believe that it could lead to numerous benefits, including a reduction in alcohol-related accidents and health issues, as well as an improvement in young adults' decision-making capabilities.

This essay will explore these arguments and examine whether raising the drinking age to 25 is a beneficial policy change. By analyzing expert opinions, statistical evidence, and societal impacts, we can better understand the potential outcomes of implementing such a change.

Impact on Health and Safety

One of the primary arguments for raising the drinking age to 25 is the potential positive impact on health and safety. Research has shown that the human brain continues to develop until the mid-20s, and alcohol consumption during this period can have detrimental effects. According to a study published in the journal "Alcohol Research: Current Reviews," alcohol use can interfere with the development of the brain's prefrontal cortex, which is responsible for decision-making, impulse control, and emotional regulation (Spear, 2010). Additionally, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reports that alcohol is a major factor in car crashes, homicides, and suicides among young adults ("Fact Sheets - Underage Drinking," 2021). By raising the drinking age to 25, society could potentially see a reduction in these incidents, as older individuals are generally more responsible and better equipped to handle the effects of alcohol. Although opponents argue that raising the age may not effectively curb underage drinking, the potential health benefits and reduction in alcohol-related accidents present a compelling case for reconsidering the current legal drinking age.

Societal and Economic Considerations

The societal and economic implications of raising the drinking age to 25 are significant. From an economic standpoint, reducing alcohol-related incidents could lead to decreased healthcare costs and increased productivity. The National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA) estimates that alcohol misuse costs the United States approximately $249 billion annually, with a significant portion attributed to lost workplace productivity and healthcare expenses (Sacks et al., 2015). By raising the drinking age, it is possible to reduce these costs and promote a healthier workforce. Societally, such a change could reinforce the perception of alcohol as a substance that requires mature judgment and responsibility. By aligning the drinking age with other age-related legal responsibilities, such as renting a car or running for certain political offices, society can further emphasize the importance of maturity in alcohol consumption. However, critics argue that this change might lead to increased illegal activities, such as fake ID usage, which could strain law enforcement resources. Balancing these societal and economic factors is crucial in assessing the feasibility and potential success of raising the drinking age to 25.

Challenges and Counterarguments

While the arguments for raising the drinking age to 25 are compelling, there are notable challenges and counterarguments that must be addressed. One significant challenge is the potential for increased illegal alcohol consumption among those under 25. As seen with the current legal drinking age of 21, many young adults still find ways to consume alcohol through fake identification or other means. According to the Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, approximately 50% of college students engage in binge drinking, indicating that legal restrictions do not entirely prevent underage consumption (Wechsler et al., 2002). Moreover, critics argue that raising the drinking age might be seen as an infringement on personal freedoms and rights, especially when individuals are considered adults in other respects at age 18. Addressing these counterarguments is essential to formulating a comprehensive policy change. It is crucial to consider complementary measures, such as enhanced alcohol education and stricter enforcement of existing laws, to mitigate these challenges effectively.

In conclusion, the proposal to raise the drinking age to 25 is a multifaceted issue with potential benefits and challenges. By examining the impacts on health and safety, societal and economic considerations, and addressing counterarguments, we can better gauge the viability and effectiveness of such a policy change. The potential reduction in alcohol-related accidents and health issues presents a strong case for raising the drinking age, but it is essential to consider the societal implications and ensure that complementary measures are in place to support this transition. Ultimately, the decision to raise the drinking age should be informed by comprehensive research and a balanced consideration of the various factors at play.

• Spear, L. P. (2010). The adolescent brain and age-related behavioral manifestations. Alcohol Research: Current Reviews, 34(4), 451-460.
• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2021). Fact Sheets - Underage Drinking. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/alcohol/fact-sheets/underage-drinking.htm
• Sacks, J. J., Gonzales, K. R., Bouchery, E. E., Tomedi, L. E., & Brewer, R. D. (2015). 2010 National and State Costs of Excessive Alcohol Consumption. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 49(5), e73-e79.
• Wechsler, H., Lee, J. E., Nelson, T. F., & Kuo, M. (2002). Underage college students' drinking behavior, access to alcohol, and the influence of deterrence policies. Journal of American College Health, 50(5), 223-236.

Did you like this example?

244

10