Juvenile Justice System Reform

Global perspectives on juvenile sentencing often clash with America's approach, despite its reputation for justice and human rights.Currently, there are approximately 41,095 inmates facing life in prison without the possibility of parole, and alarmingly, 6.2% of these individuals, amounting to 2,574, committed their crimes as juveniles ("Sentencing Juveniles"). This statistic highlights a critical issue: a significant number of inmates are incarcerated for actions they took as minors. The U.S. remains one of the few countries that permits juveniles to be sentenced as adults, a practice viewed internationally as excessively harsh and unjust.

This essay argues that the U.S. system of sentencing juveniles as adults is unconstitutional, fails to allow for rehabilitation, and misrepresents the potential for change in young offenders.

Injustice in Juvenile Sentencing

Sentencing juveniles as adults, including imposing life sentences without parole or placing them on death row, contradicts the fundamental principles of justice. Adolescents are inherently different from adults due to their developmental stage; they are more prone to impulsive and reckless behavior, which should be taken into account in legal proceedings. The case of Chandler v. Mississippi in 2015 exemplifies this issue. Joey Chandler, then 17, was declared a "mature adult" by the judge, who reasoned that his ability to perform adult-like tasks warranted adult sentencing. However, this perspective ignores essential developmental aspects that differentiate juveniles from adults. Despite Chandler's growth and positive behavior in prison, he was denied a second chance in society ("Mukasey, McCord"). This case underscores the need for a justice system that considers the potential for rehabilitation and change in young offenders.

Potential for Rehabilitation

The notion that juveniles are irredeemable and incapable of rehabilitation is fundamentally flawed. Many young offenders, like Chandler, demonstrate significant personal growth and transformation while incarcerated. For instance, Chandler earned a high school diploma and maintained a clean disciplinary record, showcasing his potential for positive change. Such evidence should be pivotal in court decisions, arguing for the possibility of reintegration into society. Furthermore, the Supreme Court's ruling that mandatory life sentences without parole for juvenile offenders violate the Eighth Amendment's ban on cruel and unusual punishments provides a glimmer of hope ("Smith"). However, this ruling alone is insufficient to address the broader issue of juvenile sentencing. A more comprehensive review of each case, considering the individual's capacity for change, is necessary to ensure justice and fairness.

Environmental Influences

Juveniles who commit serious crimes often come from environments that foster such behavior. The social and familial contexts in which these youths are raised play a significant role in their actions. The juvenile justice system was initially developed to address these environmental factors and to prevent young offenders from being further influenced by adult criminals ("Maroney"). Placing juveniles in adult prisons not only diminishes their chances of rehabilitation but also exposes them to harmful influences and environments that can hinder their personal development. By failing to address the root causes of juvenile delinquency, the justice system perpetuates a cycle of crime and punishment, rather than focusing on rehabilitation and reintegration.

Counterarguments and Rebuttal

While some argue that age should not be a factor in sentencing and that dangerous individuals must be removed from society, this perspective overlooks the developmental differences between juveniles and adults. The idea that young offenders represent "the worst of the worst" fails to consider the potential for growth and change in individuals whose brains are not yet fully developed. Juveniles deserve the opportunity to demonstrate their capacity for rehabilitation and to become productive, law-abiding citizens ("Sentencing Juveniles to Life Without Parole"). By focusing solely on punishment, the justice system neglects its role in fostering rehabilitation and second chances.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the current practice of sentencing juveniles as adults in the United States is both unjust and counterproductive. It disregards the developmental differences between juveniles and adults, fails to consider the potential for rehabilitation, and perpetuates a cycle of crime rather than addressing its root causes. To align with global standards of justice and human rights, the United States must reform its juvenile sentencing practices, providing young offenders with the opportunity to change and reintegrate into society. By doing so, the justice system can fulfill its role in promoting fairness, rehabilitation, and the potential for a brighter future for all individuals, regardless of their past mistakes.

Did you like this example?

286

15