Examining Autism Representation in Atypical

The portrayal of autism in media has been a topic of significant discussion and debate, particularly in how it shapes societal perceptions and understanding. The TV show "Atypical" enters this conversation by focusing on the Gardner family, with the central character being Sam, a teenage boy on the autism spectrum. This essay aims to critically evaluate how "Atypical" represents autism, highlighting both its shortcomings and improvements over its seasons. The analysis will explore whether the show's portrayal contributes positively to the awareness and understanding of autism or perpetuates stereotypes, ultimately discussing the importance of accurate representation in media.

Initial Missteps in Representation

In its first season, "Atypical" introduces Sam as an intellectually gifted white male, reflecting a common stereotype in the portrayal of autistic individuals on screen. This depiction falls short of representing the diverse realities of those on the autism spectrum. Sam's actions, such as declaring his love in front of his girlfriend's family, are portrayed in ways that seem exaggerated and implausible, even for someone with autism. These choices sacrifice the dignity of Sam's character, contributing to a failed representation of autism by making him appear unrelatable and ostracized. Despite the show's stated goal of spreading autism awareness, these portrayals risk reinforcing misconceptions rather than dismantling them.

The show's initial lack of consultation with individuals knowledgeable about autism further contributed to its shortcomings. With only Michelle Dean, an assistant professor without personal autism experience, advising the production, and an actor without autism playing Sam, the authenticity of the portrayal was compromised. However, in the second season, the inclusion of autistic author David Finch as a consultant marked an improvement in the show's understanding and depiction of the spectrum.

Evolving Representation in Season Two

Season two of "Atypical" broadens its scope by distributing the family's struggles beyond Sam, thus painting a more balanced and realistic portrait. In the first season, Sam is cast as the catalyst for family turmoil, indirectly blamed for his mother's affair and his sister's struggles. The narrative shift in the second season, however, highlights these issues as separate from Sam's autism, focusing instead on Elsa's attempt to mend her marriage and Casey's personal growth. By delving into each family member's storyline, the show portrays a more nuanced and believable family dynamic, wherein Sam is seen as an integral, rather than disruptive, part of the whole.

Additionally, season two challenges stereotypes by having Sam pursue art school post-graduation, an unexpected choice that defies the common portrayal of autistic individuals as solely logical or scientific geniuses. The inclusion of a diverse peer group with varied aspirations further breaks the mold, showcasing that individuals on the spectrum can possess a wide range of interests and abilities. Notably, the actors portraying Sam's peers are autistic, adding authenticity and depth to these portrayals.

Challenges and Missed Opportunities

Despite these improvements, certain aspects of the show remain problematic. Sam's social missteps, such as breaking into his therapist's house, are often not addressed appropriately by those around him, missing opportunities to illustrate learning and growth. Instead, these incidents are downplayed, with the therapist apologizing to Sam rather than addressing the gravity of his actions. This approach undermines the potential for Sam's character development and perpetuates the notion that individuals with autism are not accountable for their actions.

The family's tendency to shield Sam from the truth, such as keeping his mother's affair a secret, further reflects a lack of faith in his emotional resilience and understanding. Although Sam's quest for independence is a positive narrative arc, it is often portrayed as a reactionary measure rather than a natural progression of his character. This inconsistency between his achievements and how he is treated at home undermines the show's message about the capabilities of individuals on the spectrum.

Recommendations for Authentic Representation

To enhance its portrayal of autism, "Atypical" could benefit from incorporating a focus group of autistic individuals to inform its narrative and character development. By drawing from real experiences, the show could present a more authentic and varied picture of life on the spectrum, fostering a deeper understanding among its audience. Additionally, addressing the balance between humor and sensitivity is crucial. While the show's humor offers lighthearted moments, its reliance on "dad jokes" and cringeworthy situations can detract from the more serious themes it aims to explore.

Conclusion

"Atypical" holds the potential to significantly impact societal perceptions of autism by offering a more nuanced and representative portrayal. While the show has made strides in its second season, further improvements are necessary to accurately reflect the diversity and complexity of the autism spectrum. By prioritizing authenticity and depth in its characters and narratives, "Atypical" can contribute to a broader understanding and acceptance of autism in society. Ultimately, media representations like these play a critical role in shaping public awareness, making it imperative that they strive for accuracy and inclusivity. Through thoughtful changes and continued dialogue with the autistic community, "Atypical" can evolve into a powerful tool for education and empathy.

Did you like this example?

1434

60