Reflecting on Roger Ebert: the Voice that Redefined Film Criticism

Roger Ebert, a name synonymous with film criticism, redefined the contours of movie reviews and, in the process, became a beloved figure in both the world of cinema and journalism. His distinctive voice was not merely one of authority and knowledge, but also of passion and accessibility, making him a unique bridge between filmmakers and their audiences.

Roger Ebert began his career in 1967 at the Chicago Sun-Times, a tenure that lasted until his death in 2013. His early work already showed signs of his distinctive style—a blend of insightful critique, personal anecdote, and a profound understanding of cinema as an art form.

Ebert was more than just a critic; he was a storyteller. He had the rare ability to encapsulate the essence of a film, its emotional landscape, and its artistic ambitions in a few succinct paragraphs.

What set Ebert apart from his contemporaries was not only his comprehensive knowledge of cinema but also his approach to film criticism. He treated movies as more than entertainment; to him, they were windows into human experience, mirrors reflecting societal norms, and forums for philosophical debates. This perspective made his reviews relatable and meaningful to a broad audience. Whether discussing a blockbuster or an indie film, Ebert wrote with a conviction that the value of a movie lies in how deeply it can touch its audience, how effectively it can communicate its messages, and how gracefully it can provoke thought.

Ebert’s influence extended beyond the written word through his television shows, such as “Sneak Previews” and “At the Movies,” which he co-hosted with Gene Siskel. Their spirited back-and-forth discussions brought film criticism into the living rooms of ordinary Americans, democratizing what had once been considered an elite discourse. This accessibility was further enhanced by Ebert’s use of the simple “thumbs up, thumbs down” rating system. It was a straightforward, user-friendly method that encapsulated his democratic ethos—everyone should be able to engage with film criticism, regardless of their familiarity with cinematic theory.

Ebert’s legacy is also marked by his adaptability and embrace of new technology. He was among the first major critics to launch a personal blog and actively engage with his readers online. This adaptability showed his recognition of the changing landscape of media and communication, and his commitment to remaining relevant and connected to his audience. His blog not only featured reviews but also essays on a wide array of subjects, showcasing his versatility and depth as a writer.

In the latter part of his career, even as he battled cancer, Ebert’s voice did not diminish. After losing his ability to speak, he turned even more to the written word, communicating with his audience through his blog and social media. His illness brought a new dimension to his critiques and public presence, highlighting his personal resilience and deepening the emotional resonance of his writings. His open discussion of his health struggles and the way he continued to engage with films and his audience despite them was not only inspiring but also reflective of his belief in the power of cinema to bring people together.

Roger Ebert taught us that film criticism could be as much about the heart as it is about the mind. He showed that reviews could be both intellectually rigorous and emotionally engaging, and that a critic’s greatest tool is not their depth of technical knowledge, but their capacity to communicate and connect. Ebert’s reviews will continue to be read not just for their insights into specific films, but for their broader reflections on life, art, and the human condition. His legacy is not just in the films he critiqued but in the critical voice he crafted—one that speaks with the force of cinema itself.

As we reflect on his contributions, it becomes clear that Roger Ebert was not just a film critic; he was a cultural commentator who forever changed how we watch, discuss, and think about movies. His work remains a benchmark for those who believe in the power of cinema to shape, challenge, and enhance our understanding of the world.

Did you like this example?

257

11