Charles Manson Criminal Psychology Profile

Charles Milles Manson, infamously known as a cult leader, orchestrated a series of heinous acts of murder through his followers in California. To comprehend the development of one of the most notorious criminal figures in history, it is crucial to delve into two criminological theories: Differential Association Theory and Social Bond Theory. These theories, rooted in the context of Manson's tumultuous upbringing and the absence of a nurturing family environment, offer insights into his journey into a life of crime.

Differential Association Theory

One plausible explanation for Manson's criminal trajectory is the Differential Association Theory.

This theory posits that criminal behavior is learned through interactions with others. Manson's upbringing fits this paradigm. He never knew his father, Colonel Walker Henderson Scott Sr., a con artist who abandoned Manson's mother while she was pregnant. Subsequently, his mother, Kathleen Maddox, was imprisoned for robbery, leaving young Charles to live with his aunt and uncle in McMechen, West Virginia. His uncle, too, had a history of criminal behavior, which Manson witnessed firsthand.

Growing up in an environment permeated by crime, Manson learned to perceive criminal acts as a norm. The absence of a stable family structure further reinforced this perception. Upon his mother's release, her continued criminal activities, including grand larceny, provided a blueprint for Manson's understanding of survival. In Indianapolis, Manson began a life of crime, engaging in burglaries and robberies, mirroring the behaviors he had been exposed to. The Differential Association Theory suggests that Manson's criminal tendencies were not inherent but cultivated through the behaviors he observed and the values instilled in him during his formative years.

Social Bond Theory

Complementing this perspective is the Social Bond Theory, which highlights the significance of personal relationships in preventing criminal behavior. Manson's lack of a relationship with his father and the dysfunctional bond with his mother left him without the social anchors typically provided by family. These relationships are crucial in human development, as they instill values and norms that deter individuals from engaging in criminal activities.

Manson's interactions with his mother were tainted by her criminal exploits, offering him no moral compass or emotional stability. The void left by the absence of these foundational relationships contributed to Manson's alienation from societal norms. Without the guidance and support typically derived from parental figures, Manson was susceptible to a criminal lifestyle. The Social Bond Theory underscores how the lack of meaningful connections can lead to deviant behavior, as individuals seek belonging and identity elsewhere, often through negative influences.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the criminal evolution of Charles Milles Manson can be examined through the lenses of Differential Association Theory and Social Bond Theory. Raised amidst a backdrop of crime and devoid of nurturing familial bonds, Manson's path to becoming a notorious cult leader was shaped by the behaviors he learned and the relationships he lacked. While these theories provide a framework for understanding Manson's actions, they also highlight the broader societal implications of neglect and exposure to crime in shaping an individual's life choices. By exploring these dimensions, we gain a deeper insight into the factors that contributed to Manson's infamous legacy, reminding us of the critical role family and social structures play in preventing the descent into criminality.

Did you like this example?

323

17