Navigating the Wilderness of Humanity: Insights from the ‘Lord of the Flies’ Movie

The cinematic adaptation of William Golding’s ‘Lord of the Flies’ is much more than a mere survival narrative; it’s a profound exploration of the human psyche under the duress of societal collapse. Released in 1963 and later remade in 1990, the film translates the raw intensity and the nuanced undercurrents of Golding’s novel onto the screen, offering viewers a stark glimpse into the darkness and complexity of human nature.

From the opening scenes, the movie plunges its audience into a disturbingly idyllic setting: a deserted island, initially a picture of paradise, soon to become a stage for chaos and moral disintegration.

The story unfolds around a group of boys marooned on this island, away from the confines and constructs of society. The initial joy of freedom quickly spirals into a harrowing saga of survival, power struggles, and the eventual disintegration of order and civility.

The film’s power lies in its raw and unflinching portrayal of this descent. The characters, initially bound by the common goal of survival, gradually succumb to their primal instincts. The conch shell, a symbol of order and civilization, loses its influence as the veneer of societal norms fades, revealing the unsettling truth about human nature’s inherent duality. The transformation of characters, especially that of Ralph, Jack, and Piggy, is portrayed with an intensity that resonates with the viewer, forcing one to confront uncomfortable questions about morality, leadership, and the innate propensity for savagery.

The directors of both film adaptations, Peter Brook (1963) and Harry Hook (1990), use the visual medium to amplify themes present in Golding’s text. The starkness of the black and white film in Brook’s version adds a layer of grim reality, while Hook’s use of color in the latter adaptation highlights the stark contrast between the lushness of the surroundings and the dark events unfolding within it. The cinematography, focusing on the hauntingly beautiful yet increasingly menacing landscape, mirrors the internal tumult and deterioration of the boys’ societal structure.

Perhaps one of the most compelling aspects of the film is its exploration of leadership and power dynamics. The rivalry between Ralph, the embodiment of order and democracy, and Jack, who represents anarchy and tyranny, is a microcosm of larger societal conflicts. This power struggle, underlined by the haunting use of symbolism such as Piggy’s glasses or the ominous ‘Lord of the Flies’, adds a layer of depth to the narrative, making it a study of power and its corrupting influence.

Moreover, the film does not just depict the breakdown of civilization; it also offers a commentary on the nature of evil and the concept of innocence. The chilling realization that the ‘beast’ the boys fear is nothing but a manifestation of their own inner darkness is a profound commentary on human nature. The innocence of the children, juxtaposed with their capability for unspeakable cruelty, poses unsettling questions about the inherent goodness of humanity.

In conclusion, the ‘Lord of the Flies’ movie is a compelling cinematic venture that delves deep into the complexities of human nature. It’s a narrative that doesn’t merely narrate a tale of survival but forces viewers to confront the unsettling aspects of human nature and society. The haunting imagery, powerful performances, and the underlying philosophical questions make the film an enduring piece of cinematic art. It serves as a mirror, reflecting the inherent chaos and order within each individual, reminding us of the fragile veneer of civilization that separates order from chaos, civility from savagery.

Did you like this example?

234

10