How we Broke Democracy
Most people in today’s world that receive news acquire it from the internet, specifically from Facebook. This website is a social media platform that feeds information and news to us. In 2017, Facebook was just then reaching two billion users. These people are interacting with others who obtain the similar facts or news. Outlined in “How We Broke Democracy” are the ethical issues of how humans receive, filter, and process information that is given to us.
Facebook should consider deprioritizing sites that peddle in fake or unreliable sources which are easy to implement. When this social media platform processes the information we receive, it should be a neutral ground. Another way Facebook should filter what we see in our newsfeed is giving each ad equal attention. Facebook has ways of tracking exactly how long we spend on their platform consuming the media they provide to us. Also, they know how likely we are to be, how old we are, and the sort of media we tend to like or even dislike. If the content we view is strictly of what we like, Facebook needs to have what we view on a regular basis transparent; allowing space for sources that have opposing political views to enter our feed. Therefore, giving us different opinions from others rather than just what we like and enjoy. Furthermore, being transparent about this methodology will reduce any claims of us being bias.
Facebook has been one of the world’s leading social media platforms in today’s world; giving us millions of articles to read where we can stay on top of what is happening around us. This helps connect others with each other. Just because a friend on Facebook disagrees with the way we believe does not mean we should delete them. This will help us understand their perspective. If we do this, then we will not have a wall built in between us and others who disagree. Facebook has our full attention, which also deserves scrutiny in equal measure.