Gilgamesh and Joseph Campbells Monomyth

Joseph Campbell, within his seminal opus “The Hero with a Thousand Faces,” introduced the notion of the Monomyth, alternatively recognized as the Hero’s Odyssey. This narrative paradigm has been discerned in myths and narratives spanning diverse cultures, underscoring a ubiquitous framework in the domain of folklore and literary works. One of the most ancient known epic chronicles, “The Epic of Gilgamesh,” presents a compelling exemplification of Campbell’s Monomyth, notwithstanding its prehistoric origins. By scrutinizing Gilgamesh through the prism of Campbell’s schema, we can delve into the timeless allure and universal pertinence of the odyssey of the hero.

The saga of Gilgamesh, sovereign of Uruk, commences with a quintessential depiction of the hero’s cosmos. Campbell’s Monomyth commences with the ‘Call to Adventure,’ and for Gilgamesh, this transpires when his despotic reign over Uruk incites the gods to fashion Enkidu, a feral being fated to be his counterpart and adversary. The advent of Enkidu signifies the inception of Gilgamesh’s expedition from a despotic monarch to a more sagacious ruler. Their initial clash and ensuing camaraderie epitomize the ‘Meeting with the Mentor’ juncture, as Enkidu emerges as a comrade who both challenges and aids Gilgamesh in his evolution.

The crux of Gilgamesh’s narrative aligns with what Campbell terms ‘Crossing the First Threshold,’ where the hero relinquishes the familiar milieu. For Gilgamesh and Enkidu, this unfolds when they embark on a quest to vanquish Humbaba, the monstrous custodian of the Cedar Forest. This odyssey not only serves as a rite of passage but also marks their transition into uncharted territory, a pivotal facet of the hero’s odyssey that entails confronting formidable trials.

As the epic unfolds, Gilgamesh grapples with further trials and tribulations, echoing Campbell’s ‘The Road of Trials.’ The demise of Enkidu catalyzes the most profound phase of Gilgamesh’s journey—his pursuit of immortality. This segment of the narrative embodies ‘The Ordeal,’ wherein the hero encounters a momentous challenge necessitating symbolic demise and rebirth. Gilgamesh’s confrontation with his mortality during his quest to unearth Utnapishtim and the enigma of eternal life symbolizes this profound metamorphosis.

Campbell’s subsequent stages, ‘Atonement with the Father/Abyss,’ and ‘Apotheosis,’ find reflection in Gilgamesh’s interaction with Utnapishtim, who divulges the enigmas of the divine realm and the tale of the deluge, mirroring the biblical Noah. Utnapishtim subjects Gilgamesh to a trial which he flounders, yet through this setback, he attains profound sagacity concerning the inevitability of demise and the imperative of seizing the opportunities afforded by mortal existence. This marks Gilgamesh’s ‘Apotheosis,’ wherein he attains a newfound echelon of wisdom and discernment.

The ultimate stage of Campbell’s Monomyth, ‘The Return,’ materializes when Gilgamesh returns to Uruk. Armed with newfound enlightenment and a transmuted perspective on existence, he comes back as a judicious and equitable monarch who has imbibed the wisdom of his mortality. His homecoming signifies not solely the culmination of his odyssey but also the dissemination of his freshly acquired sagacity to his subjects.

By scrutinizing “The Epic of Gilgamesh” through the lens of Campbell’s Hero’s Odyssey, we encounter not only a reflection of the Monomyth’s phases but also a perennial narrative framework that persists in contemporary storytelling. The universality of Gilgamesh’s saga underscores the relevance of Campbell’s exposition in comprehending the underlying motifs of myth and the cultural import of the hero’s journey. This age-old epic not only precedes modern narrative paradigms but also enriches our comprehension of them, illustrating the profound entrenchment of storytelling in human civilization.

Did you like this example?

330

14