Causes of Conflict in Literature

The essence of conflict in literature mirrors the spice in culinary endeavors—it infuses stories with their distinct flavor. Envision perusing a tome where all unfolds seamlessly; it would scarcely engage beyond the initial pages. It is the trials, tribulations, and confrontations that draw us into narratives, compelling us to traverse their pages. Conflict serves as the pulse of storytelling, propelling characters to metamorphose and narratives to unfold. It is indispensable not solely for evoking intrigue but for mirroring the intricacies of reality, where conflict often looms unavoidably.

At its core, conflict entails a clash of divergent forces. This collision may transpire within the labyrinthine recesses of a character’s psyche, amid characters themselves, or amidst a character and the broader societal or natural forces. Each manifestation of conflict steers a narrative along distinct trajectories, delving into myriad facets of the human experience and societal frameworks.

Firstly, let us contemplate internal conflicts—those labyrinthine, convoluted skirmishes waged within a character’s inner sanctum. These skirmishes, often the most resonant and compelling, beckon us into the intimate confines of personal dilemmas and moral quandaries. Take, for instance, Hamlet in Shakespeare’s magnum opus. His vacillation and musings on morality, mortality, and vengeance forge a profound psychological conflict that besieges his actions and ruminations throughout the play. Hamlet’s quandary extends beyond the mere decision to dispatch his uncle; it delves into the moral implications of retribution and his position in a world steeped in corruption. This internal strife renders Hamlet an enduring figure, as it resonates with the ubiquitous human endeavor of grappling with one’s conscience.

External conflicts, conversely, pit characters against obstacles external to themselves. These may be categorized into several archetypes: man versus man, man versus society, man versus nature, and man versus fate. Each archetype serves to elucidate diverse facets of the human condition.

In conflicts of man versus man, characters confront each other, oft engendering a discernible protagonist and antagonist. This classical conflict, rife with tension, propels thrillers and mysteries. Consider Sherlock Holmes and Professor Moriarty, whose cerebral duel engenders a riveting narrative of virtue contending against vice. Such conflicts propel the plot forward, ensnaring our attention, and leaving us in suspense as to the eventual victor.

Man versus society conflict delves into a character’s resistance against societal norms or strictures. In George Orwell’s “1984,” Winston Smith wages war against a totalitarian regime that stifles free thought and imposes its warped reality upon its denizens. This conflict explores themes of liberty, coercion, and insurrection, prompting reflection on the value of personal freedoms and the perils of despotism.

Man versus nature constitutes another prevalent theme, particularly in survival narratives. In Ernest Hemingway’s “The Old Man and the Sea,” the protagonist, Santiago, grapples with a colossal marlin in the Gulf Stream. The conflict transcends mere piscine combat, embodying themes of human endurance, the struggle against aging, and the battle against the capricious forces of nature. Santiago’s odyssey is both corporeal and existential, emblematic of humanity’s resilience in the face of insurmountable odds.

Lastly, man versus fate often underpins conflicts wherein characters contend with their predestined lot. In Sophocles’ “Oedipus Rex,” for instance, Oedipus endeavors to circumvent a prophecy foretold prior to his birth—he endeavors to defy a destiny deemed untenable. This conflict engenders contemplation on the dichotomy of free will versus predestination, inviting speculation on the prospect of altering one’s destiny.

These conflicts are not merely conduits for tension and drama; they are inextricably intertwined with character development. Through these struggles, characters are tested, catalyzing their evolution. Conflict compels characters to make arduous choices, confront their fears, or reassess their perspectives, thereby propelling the narrative forward.

Furthermore, conflict serves as a conduit between literature and its audience, bridging the chasm between the fictive and the tangible. It affords us the opportunity to explore our own responses to analogous trials, be they internal dilemmas concerning morality or external clashes with societal vicissitudes. Through literary conflicts, we scrutinize the intricacies of our own lives, contemplate our values, and entertain diverse modes of existence.

In essence, sans conflict, narratives would lack resonance; they would fail to encapsulate the veritable essence of human existence, replete with strife, transformation, and maturation. Whether it is Hamlet’s existential turmoil, Winston’s insurrection against tyranny, Santiago’s skirmish with the sea, or Oedipus’s tragic defiance of fate, conflict imparts narratives with allure and, ultimately, with humanity.

Did you like this example?

245

13