Bob Ewell: a Product of his Upbringing

The character of Bob Ewell in Harper Lee's "To Kill a Mockingbird" serves as a critical example of how one's upbringing can significantly influence behavior and personality. His actions in the novel, from falsely accusing Tom Robinson to threatening Atticus Finch and his children, stem from a deep-seated history of poverty, ignorance, and learned behavior from his own parents. According to an article in The Mission Podcast, “Children learn how to communicate from their parents” (Here Are 5 Unbelievably Toxic Things Good Parents Never Do).

This insight is evident in Ewell's character, demonstrating how his low-income and toxic upbringing shaped him into the man he becomes. This essay will explore Bob Ewell's personality and actions, analyze the influence of his upbringing on his behavior, and discuss the implications for his children.

Bob Ewell’s Personality and Upbringing

Bob Ewell's character in the novel exhibits dishonesty and arrogance, particularly during the trial where he falsely accuses Tom Robinson of assaulting his daughter, Mayella. His deceitful nature becomes apparent as he attempts to corroborate Sheriff Heck Tate's testimony without truly understanding or listening to what is being said. This is evident when he responds with “How’s that?” to Atticus Finch's probing questions (Lee 176). His evasive and contradictory answers suggest a man who is not only lying but is also accustomed to manipulating the truth to fit his narrative. This behavior can be traced back to the environment in which he was raised—one that presumably valued survival over integrity and truth.

Ewell’s dishonesty is not merely a personal flaw but a survival mechanism ingrained through years of hardship and a lack of moral guidance. His background is marked by poverty and neglect, which undoubtedly contributed to his distorted sense of right and wrong. His actions are reflective of a man who has learned to navigate life through deceit and aggression, as these traits were likely necessary for his own survival in a harsh and unforgiving environment.

Hostility Towards Atticus and Threats to Jem and Scout

Bob Ewell's hostility is not limited to the courtroom; it extends into his interactions with Atticus Finch and his children, Jem and Scout. After the trial, Ewell's anger and frustration culminate in a public altercation where he spits on Atticus and threatens his life (Lee 217). This behavior is not just an emotional outburst but a testament to his inability to handle confrontation in a rational manner. Ewell's aggression can be seen as a learned behavior, a method of asserting power and control when he feels threatened or belittled.

Moreover, Ewell's attempt to harm Jem and Scout highlights his lack of moral compass and the extent to which his upbringing has influenced his actions. The attack on the children while they are returning from a school event is a deeply troubling act, indicative of a man who sees violence as a means to an end. When Bob Ewell is found dead with a knife in his ribs, it is revealed that Boo Radley intervened to protect the children, underscoring the narrative of good versus evil that runs throughout the novel. Ewell’s actions reveal a man driven by bitterness and a misguided sense of vengeance, further illustrating the impact of his toxic upbringing.

The Implications for Ewell’s Children

The influence of Bob Ewell’s upbringing on his children is a significant concern, as there is a real possibility that they might inherit his behavioral patterns. The novel provides limited insight into the lives of Ewell’s children, but it is evident that they live in an environment fraught with neglect and poor role models. Mayella Ewell, the eldest, exhibits signs of her father's influence, particularly during her testimony in court, yet she also expresses loneliness and a desire for human connection, suggesting a potential for change.

The cycle of learned behavior is a critical theme in "To Kill a Mockingbird." Children model their parents' actions, and in an environment like the Ewell household, the risk of perpetuating negative behaviors is high. To break this cycle, there would need to be intervention and positive role models to guide the children towards different paths. Unfortunately, the novel leaves readers with uncertainty about the future of Ewell’s children, emphasizing the profound impact of parental influence.

Conclusion

In conclusion, Bob Ewell's character in "To Kill a Mockingbird" is a vivid illustration of how deeply one's upbringing can shape behavior and moral judgment. His actions throughout the novel—lying in court, threatening Atticus, and attempting to harm children—stem from a life of poverty, ignorance, and learned aggression. While the book primarily focuses on the events surrounding the trial and its aftermath, it subtly highlights the potential consequences for Ewell's children, who might follow in their father's footsteps without positive intervention. Ewell's character serves as a cautionary tale about the enduring impact of parental influence and the importance of breaking cycles of negativity for future generations.

Did you like this example?

293

15