Allegorical Representation in “Everyman”: Mortality and Morality

Introduction

The medieval morality play "Everyman" stands as one of the most enduring allegorical dramas in Western literature, offering audiences across centuries a profound meditation on mortality, moral accountability, and spiritual preparation. Composed in the late fifteenth century, this anonymous work emerged from a cultural landscape dominated by Catholic doctrine and the omnipresent awareness of death following the devastation of the Black Death. Through its titular protagonist—an allegorical representation of all humanity—the play dramatizes the universal journey toward death and judgment, employing personified abstractions to convey complex theological concepts in accessible theatrical form.

Its central narrative follows Everyman as he receives an unexpected summons from Death and desperately seeks companions for his final reckoning, only to discover that most worldly associations ultimately prove unreliable. This essay examines "Everyman" as both a theological instrument and literary achievement, analyzing its allegorical structure, didactic function, and enduring relevance. By investigating how the play employs personification, symbolic journeys, and dramatic revelation to articulate its spiritual message, this analysis illuminates the sophisticated artistic techniques through which medieval dramatists communicated religious instruction while engaging fundamental human concerns about mortality, virtue, and transcendence.

Allegorical Structure and Personification

At its structural foundation, "Everyman" employs allegory—the representation of abstract concepts through concrete figures—as its principal literary strategy. This allegorical framework operates on multiple levels, beginning with the protagonist himself. Everyman functions not as an individualized character but as a universal representative of humanity, allowing medieval audiences (and subsequent readers) to recognize themselves in his spiritual predicament. This universalizing technique reflects the play's didactic purpose: to demonstrate that all people, regardless of status or circumstance, must ultimately face divine judgment. As scholar V.A. Kolve observes, "The play eliminates the contingencies of individual human experience to isolate the essential pattern of Christian life and death." This essential pattern emphasizes not biographical particularity but moral exemplarity, focusing on the soul's preparation for the afterlife rather than the specifics of earthly existence.

The play's extensive use of personification further develops its allegorical structure. Abstract qualities and concepts appear as dramatized characters who interact with Everyman, making theological principles tangible through theatrical embodiment. These personifications fall into several categories that illustrate different relationships to the protagonist. Worldly associations such as Fellowship, Kindred, and Cousin represent social connections that prove unreliable in spiritual crisis. Material concerns appear as Goods, demonstrating the ultimate worthlessness of wealth at life's end. Bodily attributes emerge through physical personifications like Beauty, Strength, Discretion, and Five-Wits, all of which eventually abandon Everyman as death approaches. Only moral and spiritual qualities—particularly Knowledge, Good Deeds, and Confession—offer genuine assistance for the final journey.

This personification technique serves multiple functions beyond simple didacticism. It transforms internal spiritual conflicts into external dramatic action, allowing audiences to visualize the protagonist's moral choices through concrete stage interactions. As medieval drama scholar Pamela King notes, "The play externalizes internal struggle, giving theatrical form to the psychological process of spiritual preparation." Additionally, personification creates memorable embodiments of complex theological concepts, making abstract principles accessible to diverse audiences regardless of literacy or formal education. The theatrical visibility of these abstractions—Knowledge physically leading Everyman to Confession, for instance—converts intellectual understanding into sensory experience, reinforcing doctrinal messages through the affective power of performance.

The Summons and Journey Framework

The narrative structure of "Everyman" centers on two interconnected frameworks: the unexpected summons and the subsequent journey. The play opens with God commanding Death to bring Everyman to spiritual reckoning, establishing the central dramatic premise: "Everyman, thou art summoned thy reckoning to make before God's high justice." This sudden call initiates both the dramatic action and the protagonist's spiritual crisis, as he realizes his unpreparedness for judgment. The summons motif draws on biblical parallels (particularly the parable of the rich man in Luke 12) while reflecting medieval consciousness of death's unpredictability—a cultural preoccupation intensified by plague experiences. As historian Johan Huizinga notes in "The Waning of the Middle Ages," this period was characterized by an "incessant preoccupation with death, a preoccupation rising at times to morbid anxiety," making the play's premise immediately resonant with contemporary audiences.

Following this summons, the play's action unfolds as a journey narrative—Everyman's desperate search for companions on his final pilgrimage. This journey framework serves both dramatic and theological purposes. Dramatically, it provides movement and momentum, transforming abstract spiritual preparation into physical quest as the protagonist moves between potential companions. Theologically, it evokes the Christian conception of life itself as pilgrimage—a temporary journey toward eternal destination. The journey structure also enables the play's central revelations about mortality and moral accountability to emerge organically through Everyman's encounters with various personifications, creating a series of instructive episodes rather than static doctrinal pronouncements.

Abandonment and Revelation

The central dramatic movement of "Everyman" follows a pattern of sequential abandonment, as the protagonist discovers which companions prove unreliable in his final need. This abandonment pattern creates a series of dramatic revelations that develop the play's theological message while building emotional resonance. The structure resembles concentric circles moving from external social connections inward toward more intimate associations, with each desertion further isolating the protagonist until he recognizes his ultimate spiritual dependency. The sequence begins with Fellowship's immediate retreat when learning Everyman's destination: "Whether ye have loved me or no, / By Saint John, I will not with thee go." Kindred and Cousin similarly refuse accompaniment despite initial promises, illustrating the play's skepticism about familial loyalty in spiritual matters.

The abandonment of Goods represents a particularly significant revelation, as Everyman discovers that material wealth not only refuses assistance but actively impedes spiritual preparation. Goods explicitly acknowledges his corrupting influence: "My condition is man's soul to kill," revealing that attachment to material possessions jeopardizes salvation rather than securing well-being. This encounter dramatizes biblical warnings against wealth (particularly Matthew 19:24) while reflecting late medieval anxieties about commercial development and its spiritual implications. As economic historian Diana Wood observes, the fifteenth century witnessed increased tension between emerging commercial values and traditional religious teachings, making Goods' revelations particularly relevant to contemporary audiences navigating changing economic structures.

The subsequent abandonments by physical attributes—Beauty, Strength, Five-Wits, and Discretion—create the play's most powerful demonstration of human transience. Unlike social connections or material possessions, which might be voluntarily relinquished, bodily qualities inevitably fade regardless of individual choice. This section dramatizes the progressive physical diminishment accompanying death, as Strength confesses: "The game of death I may not flee." These personifications abandon Everyman in sequence, creating a theatrical representation of physical deterioration that concretizes mortality's inexorable progress. This pattern culminates in Knowledge's statement that she too must remain behind at the grave, suggesting that intellectual understanding itself proves insufficient for the final spiritual transition: "I will not thee forsake till thou be dead, but here I must leave thee alone." Through these staged desertions, the play creates an experiential lesson about the limitations of all worldly dependencies.

Good Deeds and Sacramental Theology

Amid the pattern of abandonment, Good Deeds emerges as the sole companion capable of accompanying Everyman beyond death to final judgment. This singular loyalty establishes the play's central theological claim about salvation requirements: "For before God thou shalt answer, and for thee pay; / Better than angel's deed, I dare well say." Unlike other personifications, Good Deeds initially appears incapacitated, weakened by the protagonist's moral neglect: "Here I lie, cold in the ground; / Thy sins have me bound / That I cannot stir." This dramatic representation of moral insufficiency creates a central problem requiring resolution, as Everyman discovers that his only reliable companion lacks strength to assist him. This predicament establishes the narrative necessity for spiritual intervention, preparing audiences for the play's exposition of sacramental theology.

The solution to Good Deeds' weakness comes through Confession, who provides a "jewel called penance" enabling moral rehabilitation. This introduction of sacramental elements reflects the play's adherence to Catholic doctrine, particularly emphasizing the necessity of confession and penance for salvation. Knowledge guides Everyman to this sacramental encounter, illustrating the relationship between intellectual understanding and spiritual practice in medieval theology. Through this sequence, the play dramatizes the process of contrition, confession, and satisfaction central to medieval penitential practice. As religious historian Eamon Duffy notes in "The Stripping of the Altars," these sacramental practices formed "the framework of most people's experience of Christianity" in late medieval England, making their theatrical representation immediately recognizable to contemporary audiences.

The revitalization of Good Deeds following confession creates both dramatic resolution and theological instruction: "For now I will walk with thee and be thy guide." This transformation visualizes the Catholic understanding of how sacramental participation enables effective moral action, connecting institutional religious practice with spiritual outcome. Significantly, Good Deeds brings her sister Knowledge to assist Everyman, suggesting the complementary relationship between moral action and spiritual understanding. Together they provide Everyman with sacramental preparation for death, including extreme unction: "Everyman, I will go with thee and be thy guide, / In thy most need to go by thy side." This emphasis on sacramental preparation reflects the play's origins in a society where religious rituals provided essential structure for navigating mortality.

The Final Accounting

The play's climactic scene depicts Everyman's descent into the grave accompanied only by Good Deeds, dramatizing the final transition from life to judgment. This scene employs theatrical symbolism to represent theological concepts of moral accountability, with Everyman's "book of count" serving as material representation of his spiritual record: "Here I deliver my reckoning and my deed." The physical presentation of this account book to Good Deeds creates visible manifestation of the abstract concept of divine judgment, converting theological doctrine into theatrical action. The protagonist's preparation culminates in a prayer expressing the play's central message about salvation requirements: "Into thy hands, Lord, my soul I commend; / Receive it, Lord, that it be not lost; / As thou me boughtest, so me defend."

This final accounting scene serves both narrative and theological functions. Narratively, it provides dramatic resolution to the protagonist's initial crisis, completing the journey framework established at the play's outset. Theologically, it reinforces the work's central instructional message about preparation for judgment, emphasizing both divine mercy and human responsibility: "This moral men may have in mind; / Ye hearers, take it of worth, old and young, / And forsake pride, for he deceiveth you in the end." The Angel's reception of Everyman's soul provides reassurance about salvation's possibility while maintaining emphasis on necessary preparation: "Thy reckoning is crystal-clear; / Now shalt thou into the heavenly sphere." This conclusion balances divine judgment with redemptive possibility, reflecting Catholic theology's emphasis on both moral accountability and sacramental grace.

The Doctor's epilogue explicitly articulates the play's instructional purpose, directly addressing the audience to reinforce its moral application: "This matter is wondrous precious, / But the intent of it is more gracious." This direct statement of purpose reflects the work's function as theological instruction, converting theatrical experience into spiritual preparation by encouraging spectators to apply the drama's lessons to their own lives: "Remember Beauty, Five-Wits, Strength, and Discretion, / They all at the last do Everyman forsake." This explicit moralization demonstrates the play's participation in what literary historian Lawrence Ryan terms "the penitential tradition," which employed various artistic forms to encourage spiritual self-examination and moral reform.

Dramatic Techniques and Theatrical Context

Beyond its theological content, "Everyman" demonstrates sophisticated dramatic techniques that contributed to its effectiveness as both religious instruction and theatrical entertainment. The play's structure creates a gradually intensifying progression toward death, using Everyman's increasingly desperate search for companions to build dramatic tension. This structure employs dramatic irony, as audiences recognize Everyman's misplaced confidence in worldly associations before the protagonist himself reaches this understanding. This ironic distance generates both suspense and instructional clarity, allowing spectators to anticipate abandonment while emotionally investing in the protagonist's journey toward recognition. As performance theorist Jody Enders suggests, "Medieval religious drama employed affective techniques to transform spectators into participants in the moral lessons being enacted," creating experiential rather than merely intellectual engagement with theological concepts.

The play employs varied verse forms and linguistic registers to distinguish between characters and dramatic moments, demonstrating literary sophistication beyond its didactic purpose. God's pronouncements appear in formal, elevated language reflecting divine authority: "I perceive, here in my majesty, / How that all creatures be to me unkind." Conversely, Fellowship employs colloquial expressions reflecting worldly sociability: "For, in faith, and thou go to hell, / I will not forsake thee by the way!" This linguistic variation creates characterization through speech patterns while establishing hierarchical relationships between personifications. Additionally, the play employs rhetorical patterns, particularly anaphora and parallel structures, to emphasize key theological points: "For after death amends may no man make, / For then mercy and pity doth him forsake." These poetic techniques demonstrate the anonymous playwright's literary skill while enhancing the work's memorability for audiences.

Understanding "Everyman" requires situating it within late medieval theatrical practices, particularly the tradition of religious drama. The play likely emerged from the same cultural matrix that produced mystery cycles and saint plays, sharing their didactic purpose while employing different dramatic structures. Unlike cycle dramas presenting biblical narratives, "Everyman" creates an original allegorical scenario, demonstrating the versatility of medieval religious theater. Performance historian O.B. Hardison suggests the play may have been performed by professional actors rather than guild members, possibly in hall settings rather than outdoor pageant structures. This professional context would explain the work's sophisticated dramatic construction and linguistic complexity, as it may have been created for performers with theatrical training rather than amateur participants. While performance records remain limited, the play's structure suggests it required minimal staging resources, focusing audience attention on verbal exchange rather than spectacular effects.

Historical Context and Cultural Impact

The historical context of "Everyman" significantly shaped both its content and reception. Composed in the late fifteenth century, the play emerged during a period of substantial religious and social transformation. The aftermath of the Black Death had dramatically altered demographic patterns and economic structures while intensifying cultural preoccupation with mortality. Religious historian Caroline Walker Bynum notes that this period witnessed "increased attention to the physical processes of death and decomposition," reflected in artistic phenomena from transi tombs to memento mori imagery. "Everyman" participates in this broader cultural fascination with mortality, converting macabre preoccupation into constructive spiritual instruction by emphasizing preparation rather than dwelling on physical decay.

The play also reflects late medieval religious currents, particularly tensions between institutional sacramental theology and emerging reform movements. Its emphasis on sacramental preparation aligns with orthodox Catholic doctrine, while its critique of material wealth and social status demonstrates affinities with reform-minded spirituality. The play navigates these currents by affirming institutional sacramental practices while emphasizing personal moral accountability, suggesting that formal religious observance requires genuine spiritual engagement to prove effective. This balanced position reflects the religious climate preceding the Protestant Reformation, when reform impulses existed within Catholic contexts rather than standing in opposition to them. As religious historian Eamon Duffy demonstrates, late medieval English Catholicism maintained significant vitality despite institutional challenges, with laypeople actively engaging religious practices rather than passively accepting clerical authority.

"Everyman" has demonstrated remarkable cultural persistence beyond its medieval origins, continually finding relevance through adaptations and reinterpretations. The play survived the religious transformations of the Reformation, despite its explicitly Catholic sacramental theology, suggesting its fundamental concerns transcended specific doctrinal positions. Modern productions often emphasize existential rather than specifically religious dimensions of the work, focusing on universal human confrontation with mortality rather than particular theological frameworks. Contemporary adaptations have reimagined the allegorical figures to reflect modern social structures, demonstrating the play's adaptability to changing cultural contexts. This enduring relevance stems from the work's engagement with universal human experiences—particularly mortality awareness and the search for meaning—that remain compelling despite shifting religious and philosophical frameworks.

Conclusion

"Everyman" stands as a sophisticated artistic achievement that transcends its immediate didactic purpose, employing theatrical techniques to engage fundamental human concerns about mortality, moral responsibility, and spiritual preparation. Through its allegorical structure, the play transforms abstract theological concepts into concrete dramatic action, creating an accessible framework for engaging complex religious ideas. Its pattern of progressive abandonment builds toward powerful revelations about worldly transience, while its presentation of Good Deeds offers constructive response to the universal human condition it portrays. Beyond its specific Catholic theological framework, the play addresses enduring questions about what truly matters at life's end—questions that retain relevance across centuries and cultural transformations.

The play's artistic sophistication challenges simplistic distinctions between didactic and aesthetic purposes in medieval literature, demonstrating how religious instruction could employ complex literary techniques and psychological insight. Its enduring appeal suggests that effective moral art transcends immediate historical contexts by engaging fundamental human experiences in ways that remain accessible across temporal and cultural boundaries. As contemporary audiences continue to find resonance in Everyman's journey toward death and judgment, the play demonstrates how theatrical allegory can transform abstract philosophical concerns into embodied experience. In dramatizing the universal human confrontation with mortality, "Everyman" offers not merely historical insight into medieval religious sensibilities but continuing invitation to consider what ultimately accompanies each person on their final journey.

Did you like this example?

234

10