The Concept of Personhood: Exploring Moral and Ethical Dimensions

Decisions about right and wrong delve deeply into questions of morality and human nature. At what point does an individual truly grasp the moral compass that distinguishes right from wrong? Furthermore, does the ability to differentiate between these ethical polarities define what makes someone a "person" distinct from merely being a "human"? These questions delve into the intricate distinction between a "human" and a "person." While a human being is defined by genetic makeup and biological characteristics, the transition to personhood involves a more complex journey of moral and ethical development.

Thus, a human might not always be considered a person at every stage of life. The ability to discern right from wrong and make decisions based on moral beliefs is a key characteristic that defines a person.

This philosophical inquiry bears significant implications for the contentious debate on abortion. At its core, it prompts us to examine who qualifies as a "person." Definitions vary as the term "person" is broad and subjective, shaped by individual perspectives. A person, as suggested earlier, is someone capable of distinguishing right from wrong. For instance, an adult is typically considered a person due to their developed moral reasoning and personal attributes, while a baby, though human, may not yet possess these traits. An adult, therefore, embodies both human genetics and the capacity for moral judgment. The common sentiment of including a trained dog as part of the family highlights this distinction. While a trained dog may not have human genetic makeup, it can be seen as a "person" in a sense because it can learn right from wrong. This comparison underscores the nuanced difference between "human" and "person."

Perspectives on Personhood

Mary Anne Warren, a prominent philosopher, asserts that to be considered a "person," one must understand life's meaning. This understanding involves communication skills, not merely through speech but through the ability to interact and make moral judgments. Warren emphasizes that to qualify as a person, one should be able to reason logically and respond to various situations with ethical discernment. For example, a baby positioned near a busy street does not comprehend the dangers, highlighting its status as a "human" rather than a "person," as it lacks the capability to make right-from-wrong decisions. Warren's perspective aligns with her support for abortion, as she argues that a zygote, embryo, or fetus (ZEF) lacks the characteristics of personhood. A ZEF is incapable of forming moral judgments and, therefore, remains a human but not a person in Warren's view.

Contrasting this stance, Don Marquis offers a different perspective on abortion's morality. He contends that abortion is morally wrong, arguing that a fetus, though not yet a person, is a potential person. According to Marquis, terminating a fetus deprives it of the opportunity to develop into a person with moral awareness. He likens a fetus to a "like me" entity, destined to grow into an individual capable of experiencing life's opportunities. Marquis posits that the moral wrongness of killing transcends the stage of life, asserting that alternatives, such as birth control and abstinence, can prevent pregnancies and consequently reduce the need for abortion.

Personal Reflection on Personhood

My definition of a "person" aligns with aspects of both Warren's and Marquis's theories, though with nuanced differences. While I agree that a person should discern right from wrong, I also believe that a baby possesses the potential for personhood. To me, non-human entities like dogs and hypothetical aliens, which cannot communicate directly with humans, fall outside the definition of personhood. Humans, as a learning species, acquire moral beliefs and life skills from their parents. Consequently, being in a learning stage should not preclude one from being considered a person. Despite a baby's limited moral awareness, it is a "potential person" with the prospect of becoming a fully realized person.

In this context, my definition aligns with Marquis's argument against abortion. Though a fetus may not yet distinguish right from wrong, it is on a developmental trajectory toward personhood. As all humans begin life similarly, in the womb, selectively granting personhood to some fetuses over others contradicts the moral principle against picking and choosing, which is often deemed wrong. Those performing abortions, typically medical experts, are knowledgeable individuals capable of ethical reasoning. They should recognize that while a fetus is not presently a person, it is on the path to becoming one. Therefore, the act of terminating a potential person warrants ethical scrutiny.

Conclusion

My perspective on abortion is complex and multifaceted. Ultimately, I lean toward supporting Marquis's theory against abortion. While I maintain that a person should discern right from wrong, I assert that potential persons deserve consideration as well. Abortion serves a purpose, and individuals should have the option when necessary, especially if unprepared for parenthood. However, timely decisions are crucial to avoid complicating the process as the fetus approaches personhood. The societal issue of "babies having babies" highlights the importance of responsible decision-making. Pregnancy announcements celebrate the potential for new life, underscoring the belief that an unborn baby deserves the same opportunities as any living person.

In conclusion, understanding personhood involves recognizing the moral and ethical implications of potentiality. Adults aware of their situations should assess their readiness for parenthood, as Marquis suggests, to avoid depriving a ZEF of future experiences. By acknowledging that everyone begins life as a potential person, we can ensure that all individuals have the opportunity to grow and learn from life's experiences. This understanding forms the foundation for a more nuanced and compassionate approach to abortion and the broader concept of personhood.

Did you like this example?

864

36