Why to Kill a Mockingbird should be Banned Essay

Introduction

“To Kill a Mockingbird,” Harper Lee’s Pulitzer Prize-winning novel, has stirred heated controversy in educational contexts due to its themes and language. While some argue that the novel should be banned in middle and high schools, it is crucial to acknowledge the novel’s relevance in addressing significant subjects such as growing up, critical social concerns, and overcoming life challenges.

The Novel’s Versatility

“To Kill a Mockingbird” stands as a versatile work that explores the disintegration of youthful innocence, racism, and social issues within a small town’s context.

Through the eyes of Scout and Jem, the book portrays the challenges faced by black individuals seeking a fair trial and addresses issues of segregation and inequality (Mohammed & Abd Alhadi, 2020). The novel serves as a platform to discuss complex questions and teaches children to rely on their inner world of representation when confronted with challenging situations.

Denouncing Racism and Prejudice

Contrary to what some detractors claim, “To Kill a Mockingbird” genuinely condemns racism and prejudice. The book examines both sides of racism, emphasizing the importance of knowing the historical context. Although offensive to some, the language used in the book accurately reflects the time period and societal norms (Selk). Through the story, the novel teaches valuable life lessons about empathy, justice, and the importance of standing up for one’s beliefs.

Historical and Academic Value

One of the book’s most significant merits is its historical and academic value, providing insight into the views of people during that time period. Although it includes inappropriate language, it serves as an authentic representation of historical realities (Selk). The writing style and vocabulary can be used as valuable examples for students to learn from. Banning the novel would mean depriving students of an important perspective on history and the opportunity to understand the past.

Respecting Individual Choice

The prohibition of books creates ethical difficulties and violates individuals’ right to choose their reading material. Everyone has their own set of beliefs and viewpoints, and it is not fair to forbid a book that offends one person for the benefit of everyone else. Students should be permitted to pick what they want to read, and schools should provide diverse literature to encourage critical thinking.

Learning Life Lessons

“To Kill a Mockingbird” imparts valuable life lessons about empathy, understanding, and the significance of a person’s conscience in guiding their actions. Atticus Finch’s parenting approach instills fairness and equality in his children, teaching them to consider others’ perspectives and stand up for what they believe in (James & Nair, 2017). These lessons are essential for personal growth and promoting a just and compassionate society.

Conclusion

Banning “To Kill a Mockingbird” from educational settings would be a disservice to students. The novel’s versatility, denouncement of racism, historical and academic value, and the lessons it imparts make it a valuable literary work. By embracing the novel’s powerful messages and themes, students can gain a deeper understanding of societal issues, empathy, and the complexities of growing up. Instead of censoring this important piece of literature, schools should encourage open discussions and critical thinking about its content, enabling students to learn and grow from its valuable lessons.

Did you like this example?

308

13