Walking with Holden: Interpreting “Coming through the Rye”

For generations, J.D. Salinger’s “The Catcher in the Rye” has enraptured readers, educators, and critics alike, largely due to its relatable teenage protagonist, Holden Caulfield. Within the narrative, there’s a recurrent theme attached to Robert Burns’ poem, “Comin’ Thro’ the Rye”. The poem itself, and Holden’s interpretation of it, provides a profound window into the psyche of Salinger’s character and the broader themes of the novel.

Robert Burns, the famed Scottish poet, penned “Comin’ Thro’ the Rye” in the late 18th century.

The poem discusses a young maiden named Jenny who is literally coming through a rye field and getting wet in the process, causing her to ruin her clothing. Burns’ poem, on the surface, is a light-hearted ditty about youthful indiscretions and carefree dalliances. However, when transferred into Salinger’s world, the poem takes on deeper significance.

Holden Caulfield’s attachment to the poem stems from a line that he mistakenly recalls as “if a body catch a body coming through the rye.” This misremembered version resonates deeply with Holden, as he envisions himself as the ‘catcher’—a guardian of innocence—standing in a rye field, ready to save children from falling off a cliff and being thrust into the harsh realities of adulthood. It’s a poignant image, representing Holden’s own fear of growing up and facing the complexities of life.

Holden’s idealistic vision is indicative of his character throughout the novel. He’s constantly at odds with the adult world, seeing it as “phony” and superficial. In his eyes, childhood represents purity, genuineness, and honesty—all values he finds lacking in the adult realm. His younger sister, Phoebe, serves as a touchstone for these values. Thus, the act of catching children in the rye isn’t just about physical salvation, but about preserving the intangible qualities that he cherishes.

However, as the narrative progresses, it becomes evident that Holden’s interpretation is flawed, or at least overly simplistic. His desire to shield children from the world’s harshness is rooted in his own traumas and his inability to cope with loss, notably the death of his younger brother, Allie. Holden’s obsession with “catching” children, then, is as much about saving himself as it is about saving others.

Moreover, his misinterpretation of Burns’ poem is fitting. Just as Jenny in the poem faces natural consequences for her actions, so too must Holden recognize that shielding children from life’s realities isn’t truly saving them. It’s a form of denial, a refusal to accept that growth, with all its pains and challenges, is a necessary part of human existence.

By the novel’s end, Holden begins to grasp this concept. In a telling interaction, Phoebe challenges Holden’s understanding of the poem and his role as the catcher. Through their conversation, it becomes evident that while Holden’s intentions are noble, they are also rooted in a naive understanding of life. Growth, change, and loss are inevitable, and while the journey may be painful, it’s also enriching.

In essence, “The Catcher in the Rye” and its symbolic interpretation of “Comin’ Thro’ the Rye” encapsulate the challenges of adolescence, the desire for preservation of innocence, and the eventual acceptance of life’s complexities. Salinger’s novel is not just a story of teenage angst but a deep dive into the human psyche’s struggle with transition and transformation. Through Holden’s journey, readers are reminded that while life can be challenging and often heartbreaking, it’s also a beautiful dance, one that’s worth coming through, even if we get a little wet along the way.

Did you like this example?

271

14