Comparative Lit: Hotel Transylvania

In the animated film series “Hotel Transylvania,” Frankenstein’s monster, commonly referred to as Frank or Frankie, stands out as a key reinterpretation of one of literature’s most iconic characters. Created by Mary Shelley in her 1818 novel, “Frankenstein,” the original creature is a complex being, whose tragic narrative explores themes of isolation, humanity, and the repercussions of scientific hubris. In contrast, the character’s depiction in “Hotel Transylvania” diverges significantly, presenting him as a friendly, humorous figure in a family-friendly setting.

Frank, as he is affectionately known in the series, is portrayed as a large, green-skinned monster with stitches all over his body. Unlike his literary counterpart, this Frankenstein’s monster is approachable and jovial, often seen participating in gags and comedic scenarios throughout the movies. He is one of Dracula’s best friends and a regular guest at the hotel, which serves as a safe haven for monsters from human persecution. This portrayal reflects a broader trend in media where classic monsters are revamped with endearing qualities to fit the animated, comedic genre.

The transformation of Frankenstein’s monster in “Hotel Transylvania” is indicative of a deeper cultural shift. Traditionally, Frankenstein’s monster has been a symbol of the dangers of playing God and the ethical limits of science. However, in the film, he represents an aspect of monster culture that embraces difference and promotes acceptance. The movies use humor and endearing character traits to challenge the stereotypical image of monsters as frightening and dangerous. This is particularly evident in scenes where Frank interacts with other characters, displaying kindness, loyalty, and a deep sense of friendship.

Moreover, the character’s integration into a community of monsters at the hotel parallels the societal push for inclusivity and understanding of the ‘other.’ By depicting Frank and other monsters as friendly and non-threatening, “Hotel Transylvania” subverts traditional narratives about monstrosity, suggesting that what makes one different should not be a source of fear or discrimination. This theme is resonant with contemporary societal issues, where there is a growing emphasis on empathy and the acceptance of diverse identities and backgrounds.

In conclusion, Frankenstein’s monster in “Hotel Transylvania” serves not only as comic relief but also as a cultural commentary on the evolution of monster archetypes in media. From a figure of Gothic horror to a beloved character in a children’s animation, Frank reflects changes in societal attitudes towards difference and the unknown. The films cleverly use the character to bridge historical literary criticism with modern-day values, showing that even the most fearsome creatures can be reimagined as symbols of friendship and acceptance. This shift not only entertains but also educates young audiences about tolerance and understanding, making Frank a memorable part of the “Hotel Transylvania” series and a noteworthy example of character adaptation in contemporary media.

Did you like this example?

229

12