Realism, Gandhism, and the Quest for Peace in South Asia

In the complex and often tumultuous geopolitical landscape of South Asia, realism has long been the guiding philosophy for major players like India and Pakistan. This ideology, with its focus on an anarchic world order where power and war hold central positions, has shaped the bilateral relations between these two nations. Despite attempts to achieve temporary peace through treaties, confidence-building measures, and agreements, the relationship remains fraught with tension. The end of the Cold War was expected to usher in a more peaceful era for South Asia, yet the reality has been a start-stop stability marked by proxy wars and persistent hostilities.

The Realist Paradigm

Realism, as an ideology, emphasizes the competitive and conflictual aspects of international relations. For India and Pakistan, this has manifested in a strategic rivalry where both countries seek to maximize their power and security. Pakistan's strategy of "bleeding India through a thousand cuts" has been aimed at destabilizing India's internal peace, often using terrorism as a tool to hamper India's growth and regional influence. India's response, shaped by its status as the largest country in the South Asian region, has been to adopt a posture that some perceive as a "big brother" attitude. This stance has significant implications for India's global image and its relations with neighboring countries.

The Role of Gandhism

In contrast to the prevailing realist approach, Gandhism offers an alternative framework for achieving sustainable peace. Mahatma Gandhi's philosophy is grounded in the principles of truth (Satya) and non-violence (Ahimsa), advocating for peace that is built on mutual trust and sincerity rather than fear and coercion. Gandhi critiqued peace treaties, arguing that they are often born out of distrust and cannot lead to long-term, durable peace. Instead, he proposed Satyagraha—a form of non-violent resistance that seeks to influence others through dialogue and cooperation rather than power and dominance.

Gandhi believed that the core reason for violence is fear and distrust, which cannot be effectively addressed through coercive force. Instead, he argued that dialogue is the most effective way to cultivate trust among contesting parties. This trust, in turn, becomes the central pillar for achieving sustainable peace. Gandhi's faith in the fundamental goodness of human nature suggests that the road to permanent peace lies in trusting this inherent goodness and fostering an environment where dialogue and cooperation thrive.

Contemporary Relevance

The current geopolitical climate in South Asia necessitates a reevaluation of strategies to promote peace. The policies of the present regime in India have led to a regional realignment, with some allies gravitating towards China. If India fails to shed its perceived hegemonic stance and refuses to engage in constructive dialogue with Pakistan, it risks alienating its neighbors and undermining its foreign policy objectives in the region. India's approach to Pakistan is closely monitored by other South Asian nations, and a continuation of strong posturing could tarnish India's image as a responsible regional power.

Gandhism, with its emphasis on dialogue and trust, provides a viable framework for breaking the vicious cycle of violence that has engulfed India and Pakistan. By reopening the Gujral Doctrine—which advocates for dialogue and cooperation with neighbors without expecting much in return—India can pave the way for a rewritten version of its foreign policy that aligns with Gandhian principles. This approach would not only enhance India's image as a peace-loving nation but also contribute to regional stability and cooperation.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the essay argues for a shift from the realist paradigm to a Gandhian framework in addressing the India-Pakistan conflict. The principles of truth, non-violence, and dialogue offer a path to sustainable peace, breaking away from the cycle of distrust and hostility that has long characterized their relationship. By embracing Gandhism and revisiting the Gujral Doctrine, India can reposition itself as a leader in fostering regional harmony and cooperation, ultimately enhancing its standing on the global stage. As Martin Luther King Jr. famously said, "Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate; only love can do that." It is through love, trust, and dialogue that South Asia can move towards a more peaceful and prosperous future.

Did you like this example?

580

31