The Theme of Money in Molière’s Tartuffe and a Doll’s House

Plays are significant cultural artifacts that have long served as mirrors reflecting societal norms and issues. Through adept characterization and thematic exploration, playwrights often illuminate complex ideas and debates. Among the most celebrated works in this regard are Molière’s *Tartuffe* and Henrik Ibsen’s *A Doll’s House*. These plays, through their richly drawn characters and compelling narratives, examine a spectrum of themes—hypocrisy, obsession, religion, and the all-encompassing influence of money. These themes remain relevant, resonating with contemporary audiences and offering insights into modern social dynamics.

Money and Power

In both *Tartuffe* and *A Doll’s House*, money is intricately linked to power dynamics, dictating relationships and social hierarchies. This dynamic is vividly illustrated in *A Doll’s House*, where Torvald Helmer's financial status allows him to exert control over his wife, Nora. He occupies a dominant position not only because of societal norms but also due to his financial superiority, which empowers him to dictate Nora's actions and criticize her spending habits. This dynamic is reflective of the broader societal expectation that men, as the financial providers, should wield authority over women. Money, in this context, becomes a tool for reinforcing patriarchal structures.

Similarly, in *Tartuffe*, Orgon’s wealth renders him influential and obstinate, allowing him to disregard the wise counsel of his family and friends. His financial security emboldens him to pursue his desires without considering the repercussions, highlighting how wealth can foster arrogance and blindness to reality. Orgon's interactions with Tartuffe, who exploits Orgon’s wealth for his gain, further illustrate the corrupting influence of money. Here, money is not just power but also a catalyst for deception and moral compromise. As Tartuffe manipulates Orgon, the play underscores how monetary power can be both a shield and a weakness, leaving those who wield it vulnerable to exploitation.

Money, Sexism, and Hypocrisy

The themes of sexism and hypocrisy are deeply entwined with the portrayal of money in these plays. In *A Doll’s House*, Nora’s struggle epitomizes the gendered limitations imposed by economic dependency. Despite her resourcefulness in securing a loan to save her husband’s life, societal norms and financial dependence force her into subservience. Her eventual realization and decision to leave Torvald highlight the oppressive nature of these economic constraints and serve as a critique of the societal structures that limit women’s agency.

In *Tartuffe*, the titular character embodies hypocrisy, using a facade of piety to exploit Orgon’s wealth. Tartuffe’s manipulation of religious devotion for economic gain speaks to the broader theme of how money can corrupt moral and ethical values. The play thus critiques not only the individual but also the societal inclination to equate financial success with virtue, revealing how easily appearances can be deceived when wealth is involved.

Money as a Double-Edged Sword

While both plays depict money as a source of power, they also illustrate its capacity to create vulnerability. In *A Doll’s House*, Nora’s debt represents both her independence and her subjugation, as it becomes a means for Krogstad to exert control over her. This duality of money—as both liberating and entrapping—is a central tension in the play. Nora’s eventual emancipation is not just a rejection of Torvald’s control but also an assertion of her identity beyond the confines of financial dependency.

Conversely, in *Tartuffe*, Orgon's wealth initially seems to secure his position, yet it ultimately exposes him to Tartuffe's schemes. Orgon’s misjudgment, fueled by his wealth and the false sense of security it provides, leads to familial discord and near ruin. Thus, both plays reveal money as a double-edged sword—capable of empowering individuals, yet equally capable of rendering them susceptible to manipulation and moral compromise.

Conclusion

In conclusion, *Tartuffe* and *A Doll’s House* offer a nuanced exploration of money's multifaceted role in shaping human relationships and societal structures. While money confers power and status, it also engenders vulnerability and moral ambiguity. Through their characters’ journeys, these plays critique societal norms and encourage audiences to reflect on the ethical implications of financial power. By examining these works, we gain insight into the enduring complexities of money as a force that can both unite and divide, empower and enslave. As such, these plays remain timeless, offering valuable perspectives on the interplay between wealth, power, and human values in any era.

Did you like this example?

802

33