The Flames of Misdiagnosis: Reflecting on “Brain on Fire”

In a world increasingly reliant on medical technology and advancements, it’s easy to assume that the realm of health care is virtually foolproof. However, the film “Brain on Fire,” adapted from the memoir of Susannah Cahalan, offers a harrowing tale that sheds light on the fragility of medical diagnosis and the challenges faced when the human body doesn’t align with textbook symptoms.

Susannah, portrayed with intensity by Chloë Grace Moretz, is a budding journalist living the quintessential New York dream.

Her life takes a drastic turn when she starts exhibiting a series of unexplainable neurological symptoms — from mood swings to seizures, eventually leading to a full-blown psychosis. As she navigates a maze of misdiagnoses, the film paints a picture of her desperate search for answers, underscoring the tension between trust in medical professionals and the innate understanding one has of their own body.

What “Brain on Fire” drives home is the fact that the medical community, despite its advancements, is not infallible. Susannah’s condition baffles a slew of doctors. They offer a range of diagnoses, from mental health disorders like bipolar disorder to suggestions that it’s all in her head. This cycle of misdiagnosis, paired with her deteriorating health, amplifies the anguish and frustration experienced not just by Susannah, but also by her family. The film portrays this dynamic vividly, reminding viewers of the profound emotional and psychological toll a medical mystery can exact on a patient and their loved ones.

Amidst this turmoil, the film also delves into a critical theme: the importance of advocacy. Susannah’s salvation doesn’t arrive until Dr. Souhel Najjar, played by Richard Armitage, enters the scene. He approaches her condition with a fresh perspective, eventually diagnosing her with a rare autoimmune disease — Anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis. Dr. Najjar’s approach stands in stark contrast to his peers. Instead of being fixated on fitting Susannah’s symptoms into established medical categories, he looks at her as an individual. His famous line to her family, “Let’s not ask what’s wrong with Susannah; let’s ask what happened to Susannah,” becomes a beacon of hope.

Beyond the personal journey of Susannah, “Brain on Fire” prompts viewers to reflect on the broader implications of medical misdiagnoses. The film raises questions about how many individuals might be suffering due to misinterpretations of their symptoms, especially in cases that don’t conform to well-known conditions. The story brings to the fore the potential pitfalls of over-reliance on standardized tests and underscores the necessity of holistic, patient-centered care.

In conclusion, “Brain on Fire” isn’t just a chronicle of one woman’s journey from illness to recovery. It’s a commentary on the complexities of the medical world, the challenges of diagnosis, and the resilience of the human spirit. By shedding light on Susannah’s battle, the film nudges audiences to be more inquisitive, more skeptical, and more compassionate. It serves as a reminder that the world of medicine, despite its wonders, is still a domain where the human touch, intuition, and a willingness to think outside the box remain invaluable.

Did you like this example?

244

10