The Creature of Mary Shelley ‘s Frankenstein

In Mary Shelley’s seminal work *Frankenstein*, the creature created by Victor Frankenstein is a pivotal character whose identity and existential plight are central to the novel’s narrative and thematic depth. Curiously, despite being one of the most iconic figures in literature, the creature is never given a personal name by his creator or by the author, a fact that adds layers of meaning to his characterization and to the story as a whole.

The absence of a name for the creature is significant in several ways.

First and foremost, it reflects his ambiguous status as both a human-like being and a piece of scientific experiment. By not naming his creation, Victor Frankenstein emphasizes the creature’s role as a scientific subject and product rather than recognizing him as a person. This depersonalization is a crucial element in understanding Victor’s moral failure and the tragic trajectory of the creature’s life. The lack of a name underscores the creature’s isolation and societal rejection, intensifying his struggle for identity and acceptance.

Furthermore, the creature’s lack of a name contributes to his symbolic function within the novel. He embodies broader themes of alienation, otherness, and the search for self-definition. Throughout the narrative, he is referred to in various impersonal terms such as “the creature,” “the monster,” “the demon,” “the wretch,” and “the fiend.” Each of these labels carries connotations that shape our perception of him, highlighting his exclusion and the horror he inspires in others. The names he is called by others serve to dehumanize him and justify the cruelty and prejudice he faces.

The creature’s awareness of his own namelessness is poignantly expressed in the novel when he compares himself to Adam, the first man, who was also without a mate, yet under completely different circumstances. Unlike Adam, the creature laments, he is “wretched, helpless, and alone.” This reference not only highlights his solitude but also his acute consciousness of his uniqueness and abandonment. It is through this self-awareness that the creature’s lack of a name paradoxically becomes a source of his identity. His namelessness reflects his unique existential predicament as a being created artificially and not born naturally, a being outside the normal social and moral order.

Additionally, the creature’s quest for identity and acceptance without a name invites a deeper reflection on the nature of identity itself. It challenges the reader to question what constitutes one’s identity—is it given by others through a name and social recognition, or can it be self-defined through one’s actions and experiences? The creature’s eloquent pleas for understanding and his philosophical musings about his own nature and fate are central to this inquiry, offering a profound critique of the societal norms that define and often constrain individual identity.

In conclusion, the creature’s lack of a name in Mary Shelley’s *Frankenstein* is not merely a trivial detail but a fundamental aspect of his characterization and a powerful narrative device. It underscores his role as Victor Frankenstein’s experiment and highlights the ethical implications of his creation. The creature’s namelessness also enriches the novel’s exploration of identity, alienation, and the existential struggles associated with being an outsider. Through his voice, Shelley invites readers to empathize with the creature, challenging the labels and perceptions that define and often limit us.

Did you like this example?

234

12