Falsely Accused of Killing William Frankenstein: Justine Moritz Trial

In Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, William Frankenstein, the youngest member of the Frankenstein clan, assumes a pivotal yet tragically fleeting role. His untimely demise stands as a crucial juncture within the narrative, marking the inception of genuine horror in the creature’s existence. It profoundly shapes the subsequent actions of nearly every principal character. This discourse delves into the ramifications of William’s character and demise, delving into how they mirror themes of innocence, loss, and the repercussions of unchecked ambition.

William emerges as a paragon of innocence and purity within the Frankenstein lineage. Portrayed as a cherubic and tender child, his abrupt and violent demise stands in stark contrast to the tranquil and nurturing ambiance fostered by the Frankenstein household. This dichotomy accentuates the horror of his murder, underscoring the profound impact of Victor Frankenstein’s endeavors on his kin. William’s innocence and his status as the favored scion imbue his demise with broader implications, transcending mere personal tragedy to symbolize the family’s forfeiture of purity and the deleterious consequences of Victor’s quest for immortality.

Furthermore, William’s demise assumes significance as it marks the creature’s inaugural act of vengeance against his creator, Victor. Nursing a sense of societal disdain and abandonment by Victor, the creature slays William in a misguided bid for retribution, laboring under the misconception that by afflicting Victor with suffering, he can convey the depths of his own torment. The creature’s selection of William as his victim underscores his burgeoning comprehension of human dynamics; he apprehends the anguish wrought by the loss of such an innocent and beloved progeny upon Victor.

Additionally, William’s murder precipitates the novel’s examination of justice and injustice. Subsequent to the homicide, Justine Moritz, a protégée of the Frankenstein household, is wrongfully accused and sentenced to death for William’s demise, despite her innocence. This miscarriage of justice further darkens the novel’s somber tone, accentuating the theme of the calamitous aftermath of Victor’s actions. Shelley utilizes Justine’s wrongful conviction to critique the legal proceedings of the era and to probe the notion of justice in a realm where the true nature of the creature remains enigmatic and misconstrued.

The ramifications of William’s demise extend beyond its immediate anguish. It epitomizes a fundamental rupture within the Frankenstein family and a metamorphosis in Victor’s persona. The sanguinity and purity that typified Victor’s nascent existence are irretrievably forfeited, supplanted by remorse, trepidation, and a thirst for retribution. This transmutation resonates throughout the broader narrative, as the tale transitions from a saga of scientific ambition to one of gothic horror.

In summation, William Frankenstein’s role within Shelley’s opus, though brief, is profoundly consequential. His innocence and premature demise serve as a poignant foil to Victor’s dark and destructive trajectory. Through William’s portrayal, Shelley not only heightens the emotional resonance of the narrative but also enriches its thematic exploration of lost innocence, the far-reaching repercussions of hubris, and the intricacies of justice in a realm where the demarcations between life and death are blurred by scientific exploration. William, emblematic of purity and the ultimate victim, endures as a potent reminder of the toll exacted by human ambition and the casualties it leaves in its wake.

Did you like this example?

229

12