The Necessity of Corporal Punisment

Category: Law
Date added
Pages:  5
Words:  1420

Crime is all over the place. Wherever we look, we discover offenders and crime. Criminals have become part of our daily lives. Does this mean we let them be the dimness of our general public? No, most definitely not. Eliminating crime and criminals is our duty, and we can not ignore it. A few offenders perpetrate a wrongdoing since they have no other choice to endure, however some do it for the sake of entertainment. If you make someone suffer, you deserve to suffer and deserve as much pain as they did. A person, who stole candy from a grocery store, certainly doesn’t deserve the death penalty. However a serial killer, who kills people for fun or for the personal gain, for sure deserves the death penalty. The death penalty should not be given just to anyone who commits a murder. It should be a plotted attack.

One of the witnesses against the death penalty in “Recent Work” before the Senate committee last year was Earl Charles, a man who spent over three years on a Georgia death row for murders he did not commit. Another witness remarked that, had Mr.Charles baby-faced a system, where the legal apparatus was speedier and the death penalty had been carried out more expeditiously, we would now be talking in concern about the late Mr.Charles and bemoaning our error. As someone who led over many of Texas’s executions, former Texas Attorney General Jim Mattox has remarked, “It is my own experience that those executed in Texas were not deterred by the existence of the death penalty law. I think in most cases you will find that the murder was committed underneath severe drug and substance abuse(“To finish the Death Penalty” 1). There is no conclusive proof that the death penalty acts as a better deterrent than the threat of life imprisonment. A survey of the previous and gift presidents of the country’s high educational sociology societies found that eighty four of those consultants rejected the notion that analysis had incontestable any deterrent effect from the death penalty. Some counterclaims would be it affects crime rate, No system is perfect and it may be expensive but worth it. Capital punishment should be illegal in the united states because we are convicting innocent people, the death penalty is way more expensive and capital punishment doesn’t deter crime. Once in jail, those serving life sentences often settle into a routine and are less of a threat to commit violence than other prisoners. Moreover, most states currently have a sentence of life without parole. Prisoners who are given this sentence can never be discharged. Thus, the protection of society is assured while not giving the mistreatment of being executed.

The execution is just too pricey and time intense to effectively forestall folks from committing murder. The death penalty in the U.S. is Associate in Nursing staggeringly pricey and wasteful program with no clear advantages. All of the studies on the price of death penalty conclude it’s far more pricey than a system with life sentences because the most penalty.

According to “The Economic Impact of the Death Penalty”, Nebraska estimated that each death penalty prosecution cost its taxpayers about $1.5 million more than a life without parole (“Death Penalty” 1). This demonstrates that we’re spending way too much money on ending someone’s life. To keep a person in jail for life it cost about $740,000 and the death penalty in other states cost about $1.2 million. Others believe the death penalty may be expensive but it’s worth it. They believe it’s worth paying with our taxes. The death penalty should also be illegal because we are wasting money on putting them to death. Why should we spend money on them? Rather than keeping them in cells to avoid more danger in our lives. They are using our money that we work hard to make to kill inmates who just deserve to be in jail for life and it cost less money for the government. According to the article “Death cure” if the death penalty was replaced with sentence of life without parole, it would cost millions of less and ensures the public that they’re protected(“Deathsecure”1). The money spent on the death penalty could be spent on something more important. We can be using it on programs and improve the communities we live in. The millions of dollars we spent could be spent on roads, education, police officers, safety programs, after school programs and even crime programs for victims and their families.

There are those that have a middle ground opinion. They believe that the penalty corporal punishment ought to be reserved for cases wherever the party is clearly guilty of the crime and therefore the crime warrants death as punishment. They suppose solely bound crimes with a concept out decide to kill earlier ought to be execution cases. This is to make sure that solely the worst get chastised this manner. The proponents to death penalty believe it may be expensive but worth it.

Carlos Deluna was executed in 1989 for the murder of store clerk Wanda Lopez in 1983.

Wanda lopez was stabbed and killed to death, but was the murderer actually Carlos Deluna? No, years later in 2006 he was found innocent and was wrongly executed. This is exactly why we shouldn’t allow the death penalty in the United States. Over 100 and fifty people area unit exonerated(“Death Penalty information Center,2).Those area unit one hundred fifty those that could’ve been dead for a criminal offense they ne’er committed. There’s an average of 3 exonerations per year. The people for capital punishment say no system is perfect, that’s all they have to say for an innocent person being wrongly accused. They say it’s someone’s life, so life for life. Many of those cases were discovered not as a result of the traditional appeals method, but rather as a result of new scientific techniques, investigations by journalists, and the dedicated work of skilled attorneys, not offered to the everyday ward inmate.

Capital Punishment doesn’t stop crime anywhere. Nationally, murder rates are significantly lower in states that don’t use the death penalty than in those with a death penalty statute and have been consistently for the past two decades. Even law enforcement agrees the most needed tool for reducing violent crime is resources for law enforcements. Most people on cellblock committed their crimes within the heat of passion, while under the influence of drugs or alcohol, or while suffering from mental illness. They represent a bunch that’s extremely unlikely to form rational choices supported a worry of future consequences for his or her actions.“The people for capital punishment say in the 1960’s there was a seven-membered rate crime rate increase”(Death Penalty,1). The idea that the execution has the ability to prevent murder is naive and clearly evidenced false by the facts. Studies that have shown the execution reduces crime are discredited by rigorous analysis. The state murder rate has declined within the years since executions stopped. Given this truth, there’s no credible argument that the execution deters crime.

Society takes several risks within which innocent lives is lost. We build bridges, knowing that statistically some employees are going to be killed throughout construction; we have a tendency to take nice precautions to cut back the amount of uncaused fatalities. But wrongful executions are a preventable risk. By substituting a sentence of life while not parole, we meet society’s needs of punishment and protection while not running the danger of associate inaccurate and irreversible penalization. Even if the corporal punishment punishes some whereas stinting others, it does not follow that everyone should be spared. The guilty ought to still be chastened suitably, even if some do escape proper punishment unfairly. The corporal punishment ought to apply to killers of black folks also on killers of whites. High paid, skillful lawyers mustn’t be ready to get some defendants off on technicalities. The existence of some general issues isn’t any reason to abandon the total corporal punishment system. The death penalty needs to be treated fairly and right.“An eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth”. This is differently for somebody to mention they’re confirmatory of the corporal punishment. The death penalty is a revenge. It kills innocent people every year. Many of the families of victims don’t wish the criminals to be place to death. The death penalty costs more than a life sentence in prison.          

Did you like this example?

Cite this page

The Necessity of Corporal Punisment. (2019, Jul 14). Retrieved from

The deadline is too short to read someone else's essay

Hire a verified expert to write you a 100% Plagiarism-Free paper