Essay about Frantz Fanon

Introduction

It is Frantz Fanon who creates the thought of the Other in his composing to be a key concern in postcolonial studies. To him the Other is the “”not me”” he is the Other. So from this perspective an effort in this study has been made to closer view such concepts. This study seeks to consider how writing depicts the Other. It appears the way to preserve specialist over the Other in a colonial situation, that is, an colonialist must see the Other as different from the Self; and thus he has got to keep up adequate identity with the Other to valorize control over it.

Politically as well as culturally the Self and the Other are represented as the colonizer and the colonized.

The Other by definition lacks character, propriety, purity, literality. In this sense he can be portrayed as the foreign: the one who does not belong to a group, does not speak a given language, does not have the same customs; he is the unfamiliar, uncanny, unauthorized, inappropriate, and the improper. To understand the concept of the Self and the Other the formalistic approach (binary opposition) is utilized which is an important idea that helps us understand how meanings are being formed, made or reinforced in a content.

Binary opposition is the guideline of contrast between two commonly exclusive terms which argues that the perceived binary dichotomy between civilized savage has perpetuated and legitimized Western control structures favoring “”civilized”” white men. The presence of ‘binaries’ within content “”acts to create regularly capable layers of meaning that work to maintain and reinforce a society or culture’s dominant ideologies””(www.englishbiz.co.uk). Index Terms—Post-colonialism, the self, the Others, binary opposition, savage, the oppressed and the oppressor.

Postcolonial theory comes about from a network of political and social tensions between colonizers and colonized. This approach will de-construct Eurocentrism appearing that European values and guidelines are not widespread. Highlighting that the same verifiable occasion can be deciphered in profoundly distinctive ways depending on point of view, standards and values, acknowledged values will be destabilized and checked as develops.

Encourage, this article will address the reasons given for colonialism and deconstructs them in arrange to uncover the financial or political interface they are based on. We will fundamentally look at the representations of Caliban’s culture in Western talk. Within The Tempest, social belief system gives the ideological organize for the colonial tries which might be theorized as bringing advance to an bygone world.

A striking case for the methodology deconstructing “othering” is uncovered in part 1 where Caliban is displayed as a totally brutal being uncovering solid prejudice. Subsequently, Shakespeare certainly legitimizes the colonial endeavor, since individuals like Caliban denied of full humankind can be respected as individuals without history, culture and they have in this manner no coherent claim to sway. Shakespeare moreover produces a symptomatic perusing of western talk by psychoanalyzing to uncover western fear of the “other”.

The Unsettling Kinship of the Self and the Other

When Chinua Achebe talks of things not “being in their place”5, he focuses at the disturbance between the self and the other. As long as there’s a clear remove and a common partition between the self and the other, things are assumed to be in their put. The disclosure of an animal of barbaric shape and encountering that it embraces humanizing properties leads to unsettlement since things are expelled from their put. Hence, values and definitions of what decides humankind become inconsistent and not settled.

Shakespeare’s thought of relations between degenerated Caliban and sensitive Miranda, which may have brought about in Miranda’s pregnancy, appears that Caliban is of human descent; something else, he might not be competent to father children with another human being. The Tempest projects the picture of the colony as “the other world,” the direct opposite of Europe and so of civilization. The character Caliban does not as it were symbolize the colonized and a casualty of mental and social abuse, but he moreover stands for the dehumanized savage. By forming the picture of the other, the colonizer characterizes himself and his normal character. (Rogers,1991)

Thematic Concern

Beneath this thought, the center is brought into a few of the theories related to consciousness where the thought of the “”Self”” is the center of subjective consciousness. One of the most features of imperial abuse, also, is control over language. It has gotten to be the post-colonial voice. As Bill Ashcroft says in his book (Key Concepts in Postcolonial Studies. 2004): …the discussion of postcolonial writing which follows is largely a discussion of the process by which the language, with its power and the writing, with its significance of its authority has been wrested from the dominant European culture. (p.7)

The fascinating thing which needs to be explained is that we often agree over our understanding of poems, novels and plays in spite of the fact that we are all different. This article explores how it is that Shakespeare communicates with us and affects us. It examines the way in which the language of his novels acts as the basis of our understanding and responses when we read Many postcolonial writers emphasize the importance of studying the aspects of the language because they know well that the translated word or the unspeakable one, as in the case of Prospero in the play of The Tempest, has a higher status than the untranslated one or the spoken one. This also helps us foreground the differences between the Self and the Other.

Originally postcolonial theory was formulated to deal with the reading and writing of literatures written in previously or currently colonized countries. Whether from the perspective of the colonizer or the colonized, post-colonization is about people and their personal experiences: the sense of disempowerment and dislocation. Postcolonial theory is built in large part around the concept of Otherness. The concept of Otherness sees the world “”as divided into mutually excluding opposites: if the Self is ordered, rational, masculine, good, then the Other is chaotic, irrational, feminine, and evil”” (www.faculty.mccfl.edu) . This construction of the Other is a process of demonization, which in itself expresses the ‘ambivalence at the very heart of authority’ (Ashcroft, Griffiths and Tiffin. 2002, P.3).

Did you like this example?

642

34