About O.J Simpson Trail
O.J. Simpson’s book If I Did It written in 2006 was almost 12 years after the murders. In this book, he explains how the murders of Ron Goldman and Nicole Simpson would have happened if he did it. There is some who believe this to be his confession to the murders and there is no way he can be so accurate if he was not there. Before the interview could air Fox canceled the special due to the fact it was revealed Simpson received a $3.5 million paycheck for the sit-down. While the book was later released, the special was not aired until March 2018.
OJ Simpson If I Did It Nicole Brown Simpson, famous football player O.J. Simpson’s ex-wife, and her friend Ron Goldman were brutally stabbed to death outside Nicole’s home in Brentwood, California, in what quickly becomes one of the most highly publicized trials of the century. With overwhelming evidence against him, including a prior record of domestic violence towards Brown, O.J. Simpson became the chief suspect.
Our writers can help you with any type of essay. For any subjectGet your price
How it works
The evidence against Simpson was extensive: His blood was found at the murder scene; blood, hair, and fibers from Brown and Goldman were found in Simpson’s car and at his home; one of his gloves was also found in Brown’s home, the other outside his own house; and bloody shoeprints found at the scene matched those of shoes owned by Simpson. (Editors, 2009) However, Simpson’s so-called “Dream Team” of defense lawyers, including Johnnie Cochran and F. Lee Bailey, claimed before a national television audience that Simpson had been framed by racist police officers such as Detective Mark Fuhrman. After deliberating for three hours, the jury acquitted Simpson.
He vowed to find the “real killers,” but has yet to turn up any new leads. (Editors, 2009) Then in 2006, the announcement of a book by OJ Simpson in which he would give an allegedly hypothetical account of the murders of his ex-wife, Nicole Brown, and Ronald Goldman made waves. (Oswalt, 2016) Originally titled “O.J. Simpson: If I Did It, Here’s How It Happened,” the book was to be published by Regan Books, a division of HarperCollins. Shortly after the announcement, the book was canceled following outrage over Simpson profiting from the deaths.
Even though he was acquitted of the murders in 1995, he was found liable for the wrongful deaths of Brown and Goldman in a 1997 civil suit. (Oswalt, 2016) However, in 2007, the Goldman family was awarded rights to the book by a Florida bankruptcy court and went through with the publication, changing the title to “If I Did It: Confessions of the Killer.” (Oswald, 2016) After more than a decade on ice, a controversial 2006 interview with O.J. Simpson aired Sunday, March 12, 2018, and left a lot of viewers believing that Simpson might have confessed the June 1994 murders of his ex-wife Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman.
In the interview, which Fox billed as “O.J. Simpson: The Lost Confession,” Simpson talks about the murders for the first time on camera. In the interview, O.J. “hypothetically” describes how he would have committed the murders if he had been the one who pulled them off. (Breech, 2018) The woman who conducted the original interview in 2006, Judith Regan, explained during Sunday’s show that the interview was pitched to her as O.J.’s confession, but he wanted to use the word “hypothetical” so that he had plausible deniability with his kids. “I received a phone call from an attorney who said, ‘O.J. is ready to confess,'” Regan said in Sunday’s show when asked how the interview came together.
“The only condition that he had was that he didn’t want to call the book I Did It. He wanted to put an ‘if’ in front of it so that he would once again have deniability with his children. He couldn’t face his children and he couldn’t tell them that he had done it. That was the way it was portrayed to me.” (Breech, 2018) “From my point of view, who would even do this, even as a hypothetical, unless they had committed the murders,” Regan said during Sunday’s show. For one, he started out by clearly stating that the entire scenario being presented was hypothetical.
“This is very difficult for me to do this,” Simpson said of recounting the night of June 12, 1994. “It was very difficult for mebecause it’s hypothetical. I know, and I accept the fact that people are going to feel whatever way they’re going to.” (Breech, 2018) Simpson then hypothetically describes the beginning of the night when he met up with a friend named “Charlie.” “In the book, the hypothetical is, this guy Charlie shows up, this guy I used to be friends with and I don’t know why he had been by Nicole’s house, but he told me,”You won’t believe what’s going on over there.”
And I remember thinking, “Whatever’s going on over there, that has got to stop,” Simpson said. (Breech, 2018) At that point, Regan asks Simpson where he parked at Nicole’s and what he was wearing when he went over there. “In the hypothetical, in the alley [is where I parked],” Simpson said. “In the hypothetical, I put on the cap and gloves.”Simpson also noted that he usually kept a knife in his car.
“I always kept a knife in the car for the crazies and stuff because you can’t travel with a gun, and I remember Charlie saying, “You ain’t bringing that [to Nicole’s]’ and I didn’t, but I believe he took it,” Simpson said. “In the book.” (Breech, 2018) After describing that scene, things got kind of weird, because Simpson went from describing everything hypothetically to describing everything in the first person. “I go to the front and I’m looking to see what’s going on,” Simpson said. “While I was there, a guy [Goldman] shows up. A guy I really didn’t recognize. I may have seen him around, but I really didn’t recognize him to be anyone. In the mood I was in, I started having words with him.”
Nicole heard the argument and went outside. At that point, a verbal argument started, according to Simpson’s account. “Nicole had come out and we started having words about ‘Who is this guy? Why is he here? What’s going on?'” Simpson said. “As things got heated, I just remember that Nicole fell and hurt herself and this guy kind of got into a karate thing, and I said,”Well, you think you can kick my ass?” And then I remember I grabbed the knife, I do remember that portion, taking the knife from Charlie.” (Breech, 2018) From there, Simpson told Regan that he blacked out.
“To be honest, after that I don’t remember, except, I’m standing there and there are all kinds of stuff around … blood and stuff around,” Simpson said. When asked if he was covered in blood, Simpson said: “everything was covered.” “It’s hard for me to describe it. I don’t think any two people could be murdered the way they were without everyone being covered in blood,” Simpson said. “Of course, I think we’ve all seen the grisly pictures after. I think everything was covered, would have been covered in blood.” Regan then mentions that, in the book, Simpson says he removed a glove at that point.
“I have no conscious memory of doing that, but obviously I must have because they found the glove there,” Simpson said. (Breech, 2018) Regan then asked Simpson if he had ever blacked out before. “Not to my knowledge,” Simpson said. “Of course, if something like this were to take place in anybody’s life, if it were to happen, I would imagine it would be something you would probably have trouble wrapping your mind around. It was horrible. It was absolutely horrible.” (Breech, 2018) Simpson then described leaving the scene. “I go back, parked a block away because I knew the limo would be there. Came across the backyard through the two tennis courts and came through the house,” Simpson said.
The former NFL star was about to catch a flight to Chicago, which is why there was a limo at his place that night. Once in his house, Simpson says he “ran upstairs to take a shower.” (Breech, 2018) After describing the night of June 12, in a first person, Simpson went back to defending himself when it came to key details after the murder. The Pro Football Hall of Famer even explained why he had a passport during the Bronco chase and said that he didn’t have $10,000 with him in the car, as police have long claimed. “There wasn’t a lot of conversation [in the Bronco],” Simpson said. “I always had my passport [on me]. I think I had three dollars and something in change [not $10,000].”
After Simpson described the hypothetical details of the crime, viewers at home were shocked. (Breech, 2018) Although Simpson was acquitted of the murders in October 1995, he was later found liable for the deaths in civil court. The former Buffalo Bills running back was ordered to pay $33.5 million after a judge ruled against him in wrongful death lawsuits filed by the families of the victims. The interview with Simpson in 2006 never aired because Fox decided to pull it after facing serious backlash from the public. On November 2006, Fox was going to air the interview in a two-part special before Rupert Murdoch personally announced that it was going to be axed. Not only did Fox shelve the TV special, but it also dumped the book.
Most of the first-print copies were destroyed in 2006, and the ones that didn’t get destroyed became collector’s items. An original printing of the book sold for $4,555 at an auction on October 2017. (Breech, 2018)Although the book was axed by publisher Harper Collins, which was owned by Fox, another version of it eventually did get released. After a judge gave the rights of the book to the Goldman’s, the family released the book on August 2007 as a way to collect on the $33.5 million court ruling against Simpson. The family believed that the book was Simpson’s way of confessing to the crime, so when they released it, they retitled the book, If I Did It: Confessions of the Killer.
Fourteen months after the book was released, Simpson was sent to jail after being found guilty of kidnapping and robbery in Nevada. Simpson spent roughly nine years in prison before being released on Oct. 1, 2017. Simpson hasn’t yet commented on the Sunday airing of his 12-year-old interview. Although, the Goldman family was on board with the interview airing, because, as mentioned before, they viewed it as Simpson’s way of confessing to the murder. (Breech, 2018) Simpson has repeatedly maintained his innocence.
Last year, there appeared to be a possible break in the case when a knife was reportedly discovered on the property Simpson once owned. But the tip led nowhere, leaving the case largely where it was in the 1990s. “OJ Simpson cannot be tried again because of double jeopardy, but he certainly can be questioned,” Levinson said. “In fact, he doesn’t have Fifth Amendment protection anymore.” The LAPD wouldn’t provide any additional details in the case. Legal experts say there are plenty of challenges that go with investigating a crime that is more than 20 years old. Among them, the fact that prosecutors are dealing with decades-old evidence and memories. (NEWS, 2017)